Individual risk assessment tool for school-age asthma prediction in UK birth cohort.


Journal

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology
ISSN: 1365-2222
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Allergy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8906443

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 19 02 2018
revised: 31 07 2018
accepted: 10 10 2018
pubmed: 18 11 2018
medline: 24 4 2020
entrez: 18 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Current published asthma predictive tools have moderate positive likelihood ratios (+LR) but high negative likelihood ratios (-LR) based on their recommended cut-offs, which limit their clinical usefulness. To develop a simple clinically applicable asthma prediction tool within a population-based birth cohort. Children from the Manchester Asthma and Allergy Study (MAAS) attended follow-up at ages 3, 8 and 11 years. Data on preschool wheeze were extracted from primary-care records. Parents completed validated respiratory questionnaires. Children were skin prick tested (SPT). Asthma at 8/11 years (school-age) was defined as parentally reported (a) physician-diagnosed asthma and wheeze in the previous 12 months or (b) ≥3 wheeze attacks in the previous 12 months. An asthma prediction tool (MAAS APT) was developed using logistic regression of characteristics at age 3 years to predict school-age asthma. Of 336 children with physician-confirmed wheeze by age 3 years, 117(35%) had school-age asthma. Logistic regression selected 5 significant risk factors which formed the basis of the MAAS APT: wheeze after exercise; wheeze causing breathlessness; cough on exertion; current eczema and SPT sensitisation(maximum score 5). A total of 281(84%) children had complete data at age 3 years and were used to test the MAAS APT. Children scoring ≥3 were at high risk of having asthma at school-age (PPV > 75%; +LR 6.3, -LR 0.6), whereas children who had a score of 0 had very low risk(PPV 9.3%; LR 0.2). MAAS APT is a simple asthma prediction tool which could easily be applied in clinical and research settings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Current published asthma predictive tools have moderate positive likelihood ratios (+LR) but high negative likelihood ratios (-LR) based on their recommended cut-offs, which limit their clinical usefulness.
OBJECTIVE
To develop a simple clinically applicable asthma prediction tool within a population-based birth cohort.
METHOD
Children from the Manchester Asthma and Allergy Study (MAAS) attended follow-up at ages 3, 8 and 11 years. Data on preschool wheeze were extracted from primary-care records. Parents completed validated respiratory questionnaires. Children were skin prick tested (SPT). Asthma at 8/11 years (school-age) was defined as parentally reported (a) physician-diagnosed asthma and wheeze in the previous 12 months or (b) ≥3 wheeze attacks in the previous 12 months. An asthma prediction tool (MAAS APT) was developed using logistic regression of characteristics at age 3 years to predict school-age asthma.
RESULTS
Of 336 children with physician-confirmed wheeze by age 3 years, 117(35%) had school-age asthma. Logistic regression selected 5 significant risk factors which formed the basis of the MAAS APT: wheeze after exercise; wheeze causing breathlessness; cough on exertion; current eczema and SPT sensitisation(maximum score 5). A total of 281(84%) children had complete data at age 3 years and were used to test the MAAS APT. Children scoring ≥3 were at high risk of having asthma at school-age (PPV > 75%; +LR 6.3, -LR 0.6), whereas children who had a score of 0 had very low risk(PPV 9.3%; LR 0.2).
CONCLUSION
MAAS APT is a simple asthma prediction tool which could easily be applied in clinical and research settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30447026
doi: 10.1111/cea.13319
pmc: PMC6446726
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

292-298

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0601361
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K002449/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L012693/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2018 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Allergy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Aug;2(8):621-30
pubmed: 24835835
BMJ. 2008 Jun 21;336(7658):1423-6
pubmed: 18558639
Eur Respir J. 1995 Mar;8(3):483-91
pubmed: 7789502
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Jun;89(6):540-3
pubmed: 15155399
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jan;133(1):111-8.e1-13
pubmed: 23891353
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jun;127(6):1466-72.e6
pubmed: 21453960
Pediatrics. 2004 Feb;113(2):345-50
pubmed: 14754947
Thorax. 2008 Jan;63(1):8-13
pubmed: 17615086
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Dec;46(12):1175-81
pubmed: 21626716
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Oct;162(4 Pt 1):1403-6
pubmed: 11029352
Thorax. 2008 Nov;63(11):974-80
pubmed: 18678704
Clin Exp Allergy. 2019 Mar;49(3):292-298
pubmed: 30447026
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):217-21
pubmed: 19384017
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2002;13(s15):32-7
pubmed: 12688622
Eur Respir J. 2008 May;31(5):974-81
pubmed: 18216047
Eur Respir J. 2008 Sep;32(3):585-92
pubmed: 18480107
Eur Respir J. 2003 Nov;22(5):767-71
pubmed: 14621083
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Mar;31(3):391-7
pubmed: 9506499
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2002 Sep;3(3):193-7
pubmed: 12376055
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug;17(8):646-9
pubmed: 12213147
Eur Respir J. 2000 Jul;16(1):81-5
pubmed: 10933089
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 23;9(12):e115852
pubmed: 25536057
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013 Mar;14(1):46-52
pubmed: 23347660
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;54(8):774-81
pubmed: 11470385
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Nov;124(5):903-10.e1-7
pubmed: 19665765
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jan 19;332(3):133-8
pubmed: 7800004
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Apr;82(4):327-32
pubmed: 10735844
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1303-10
pubmed: 23987795
Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2 Suppl):357-61
pubmed: 11826250

Auteurs

Ran Wang (R)

Division of Infection Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Angela Simpson (A)

Division of Infection Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Adnan Custovic (A)

Department of Medicine, Section of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Phil Foden (P)

Division of Infection Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Danielle Belgrave (D)

Department of Medicine, Section of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Clare S Murray (CS)

Division of Infection Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH