Time from venipuncture to cell isolation: Impact on granulocyte-reactive antibody testing.
Granulocyte immunology
Granulocyte-reactive antibody
Human neutrophil antigens
Laboratory medicine
Neutrophil stability
Transfusion medicine
Journal
Clinical biochemistry
ISSN: 1873-2933
Titre abrégé: Clin Biochem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0133660
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
03
08
2018
revised:
29
10
2018
accepted:
30
10
2018
pubmed:
18
11
2018
medline:
12
1
2019
entrez:
18
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Classical neutrophil-reactive antibody testing depends on the quick isolation of neutrophils from freshly taken whole blood. To allow a better logistic preparation before testing, the influence of time interval between venipuncture and cell isolation has been evaluated in this study. Neutrophils and whole leukocytes were isolated from EDTA whole blood immediately (T0) as well as 4, 8 and 24 h after blood donation (T4, T8 and T24). These cells were tested against reference sera containing antibodies against HNA-1b, -2, -3a and HLA class I using granulocyte aggregation test (GAT), microscopic granulocyte immunofluorescence test (GIFT) and flow-cytometric white blood cell immunofluorescence test (Flow-GIFT/WIFT). GAT was the most error-prone test displaying overall weaker aggregation strengths already at T4 (overall accuracy OA = 0.72, κ = 0.58). GIFT results showed good agreement at T4 (OA = 0.86, κ = 0.79) and remained stable until T8, while test results were slightly impaired at T24 (OA = 0.71, κ = 0.55). Flow-GIFT/WIFT was identified as the most robust screening method, remaining stable even at T24. Calculated ratios (sample/negative control) decreased non-significantly and remained highly above the cut-off in all samples. Acceptable time limits for cell isolation are different for each screening method investigated. For GAT, cell isolation should be performed within 4 h, while GIFT tolerates a neutrophil isolation delay of 8 h. Flow-GIFT/WIFT isolation can be performed even after 24 h without impairment of the results. Using the latter test as a stand-alone pre-screening test, whole blood can be used from donors who are not directly accessible.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Classical neutrophil-reactive antibody testing depends on the quick isolation of neutrophils from freshly taken whole blood. To allow a better logistic preparation before testing, the influence of time interval between venipuncture and cell isolation has been evaluated in this study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Neutrophils and whole leukocytes were isolated from EDTA whole blood immediately (T0) as well as 4, 8 and 24 h after blood donation (T4, T8 and T24). These cells were tested against reference sera containing antibodies against HNA-1b, -2, -3a and HLA class I using granulocyte aggregation test (GAT), microscopic granulocyte immunofluorescence test (GIFT) and flow-cytometric white blood cell immunofluorescence test (Flow-GIFT/WIFT).
RESULTS
RESULTS
GAT was the most error-prone test displaying overall weaker aggregation strengths already at T4 (overall accuracy OA = 0.72, κ = 0.58). GIFT results showed good agreement at T4 (OA = 0.86, κ = 0.79) and remained stable until T8, while test results were slightly impaired at T24 (OA = 0.71, κ = 0.55). Flow-GIFT/WIFT was identified as the most robust screening method, remaining stable even at T24. Calculated ratios (sample/negative control) decreased non-significantly and remained highly above the cut-off in all samples.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Acceptable time limits for cell isolation are different for each screening method investigated. For GAT, cell isolation should be performed within 4 h, while GIFT tolerates a neutrophil isolation delay of 8 h. Flow-GIFT/WIFT isolation can be performed even after 24 h without impairment of the results. Using the latter test as a stand-alone pre-screening test, whole blood can be used from donors who are not directly accessible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30447182
pii: S0009-9120(18)30828-2
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.10.017
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
72-78Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.