Massive hemorrhage protocol survey: Marked variability and absent in one-third of hospitals in Ontario, Canada.


Journal

Injury
ISSN: 1879-0267
Titre abrégé: Injury
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0226040

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 05 04 2018
revised: 05 11 2018
accepted: 09 11 2018
pubmed: 20 11 2018
medline: 24 5 2019
entrez: 20 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Massive hemorrhage protocols (MHP) are critical to standardized delivery of timely, safe, and resource-effective coordinated care for patients with life-threatening bleeding. A standardized MHP survey was sent to all hospitals (n = 150) in Ontario with a transfusion service. This study aim was to determine the proportion of hospitals with an MHP and assess for variability. The overall survey completion rate was 133 of 150 hospitals (89%) (remaining 17 providing negative affirmation that they did not have an MHP). An MHP was in place at 97 of 150 (65%) hospitals (60% of small (<5000 red cell units/year) vs. 91% of medium/large). A total of 10 different names of protocols were reported, with "Massive Transfusion Protocol" (68%) predominating. Activation criteria were present in 82 of 97 (85%); commonly activated based on volume of blood loss (70%). Blood work was drawn at the discretion of the physician (37%) or at predefined intervals (31%; majority every 60 min). Common routine laboratory tests performed were CBC (87%) and INR (84%). Fibrinogen testing was available at 88 (66%) of 133 reporting hospitals and part of the standard testing at 73 of 97 (75%) hospitals with an MHP. Median targets of hemostatic resuscitations, stated in the protocol at 49% of hospitals with an MHP, were: platelets >50 × 10 A third of hospitals lack formal MHPs, with the majority lacking in smaller hospitals. The survey results indicate that there is marked variability in all key aspects of the reported MHPs. This may be due to differences in hospital resources and personnel, lack of supporting evidence to dictate requirements, and differences in knowledge base of the individuals involved in protocol setting.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Massive hemorrhage protocols (MHP) are critical to standardized delivery of timely, safe, and resource-effective coordinated care for patients with life-threatening bleeding.
METHODS METHODS
A standardized MHP survey was sent to all hospitals (n = 150) in Ontario with a transfusion service. This study aim was to determine the proportion of hospitals with an MHP and assess for variability.
RESULTS RESULTS
The overall survey completion rate was 133 of 150 hospitals (89%) (remaining 17 providing negative affirmation that they did not have an MHP). An MHP was in place at 97 of 150 (65%) hospitals (60% of small (<5000 red cell units/year) vs. 91% of medium/large). A total of 10 different names of protocols were reported, with "Massive Transfusion Protocol" (68%) predominating. Activation criteria were present in 82 of 97 (85%); commonly activated based on volume of blood loss (70%). Blood work was drawn at the discretion of the physician (37%) or at predefined intervals (31%; majority every 60 min). Common routine laboratory tests performed were CBC (87%) and INR (84%). Fibrinogen testing was available at 88 (66%) of 133 reporting hospitals and part of the standard testing at 73 of 97 (75%) hospitals with an MHP. Median targets of hemostatic resuscitations, stated in the protocol at 49% of hospitals with an MHP, were: platelets >50 × 10
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
A third of hospitals lack formal MHPs, with the majority lacking in smaller hospitals. The survey results indicate that there is marked variability in all key aspects of the reported MHPs. This may be due to differences in hospital resources and personnel, lack of supporting evidence to dictate requirements, and differences in knowledge base of the individuals involved in protocol setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30449459
pii: S0020-1383(18)30691-0
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.026
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hemostatics 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

46-53

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Victoria Chin (V)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Stephanie Cope (S)

Ontario Regional Blood Coordinating Network, Toronto, Canada.

Calvin Hsiung Yeh (CH)

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.

Troy Thompson (T)

Ontario Regional Blood Coordinating Network, Toronto, Canada.

Barto Nascimento (B)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada.

Katerina Pavenski (K)

Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Toronto, Canada; St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Jeannie Callum (J)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: Jeannie.Callum@sunnybrook.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH