C-Reactive Protein Values After Colorectal Resection: Can We Discharge a Patient With a C-Reactive Protein Value >100? A Retrospective Cohort Study.


Journal

Diseases of the colon and rectum
ISSN: 1530-0358
Titre abrégé: Dis Colon Rectum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372764

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 20 11 2018
medline: 12 3 2019
entrez: 20 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

C-reactive protein is a useful negative predictive test for the development of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Evolution of procedures (laparoscopy, enhanced recovery program, early discharge, complex redo surgery) may influence C-reactive protein values; however, this is poorly studied to date. The aim of this study is to evaluate C-reactive protein as an indicator of postoperative complication and as a predictor for discharge. This is retrospective study of a consecutive monocentric cohort. All patients undergoing a colorectal resection with anastomosis (2014-2015) were included. C-reactive protein, leukocytosis, type of resection, and postoperative course were the primary outcomes measured. A total of 522 patients were included. The majority had either a colorectal (n = 159, 31%) or coloanal anastomosis (n = 150, 29%). Overall morbidity was 29.3%. C-reactive protein was significantly higher among patient having intra-abdominal complications at an early stage (day 1-2) (164.6 vs 136.2; p = 0.0028) and late stage (day 3-4) (209.4 vs 132.1; p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, early C-reactive protein was associated with BMI (coefficient, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.2-6.5; p < 0.0001) and open surgical procedures (coefficient, 43.1; 95% CI, 27-59.1; p < 0.0001), while late C-reactive protein value was influenced by BMI (coefficient, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.5-7.0; p = 0.0024) and associated extracolonic procedures (coefficient, 34.2; 95% CI, 2.7-65.6; p = 0.033). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values for intra-abdominal complication were 85.9%, 33.6%, 89.3%, and 27.1% for an early C-reactive protein <100 mg/L and 72.7%, 75.4%, 89.4%, and 49.2% for a late C-reactive protein <100 mg/L. Four hundred seven patients with an uneventful postoperative course were discharged at day 8 ± 6.4 with a mean discharge C-reactive protein of 83.5 ± 67.4. Thirty-eight patients (9.3%) were readmitted and had a significantly higher discharge C-reactive protein (138.6 ± 94.1 vs 77.8 ± 61.2, p = 0.0004). Readmission rate was 16.5% for patients with a discharge C-reactive protein >100 mg/L vs 6% with C-reactive protein <100 mg/L (p = 0.0008). For patients included in an enhanced recovery program (discharge at day 4 ± 2.4), the threshold should be higher because discharge is around day 3 or 4. With a C-reactive protein <140, readmission rate was 2% vs 19%, (p = 0.056). This study includes retrospective data. C-reactive protein <100 mg/L is associated with a lower risk of intra-abdominal complication and readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A749.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
C-reactive protein is a useful negative predictive test for the development of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Evolution of procedures (laparoscopy, enhanced recovery program, early discharge, complex redo surgery) may influence C-reactive protein values; however, this is poorly studied to date.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to evaluate C-reactive protein as an indicator of postoperative complication and as a predictor for discharge.
DESIGN
This is retrospective study of a consecutive monocentric cohort.
SETTINGS
All patients undergoing a colorectal resection with anastomosis (2014-2015) were included.
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES
C-reactive protein, leukocytosis, type of resection, and postoperative course were the primary outcomes measured.
RESULTS
A total of 522 patients were included. The majority had either a colorectal (n = 159, 31%) or coloanal anastomosis (n = 150, 29%). Overall morbidity was 29.3%. C-reactive protein was significantly higher among patient having intra-abdominal complications at an early stage (day 1-2) (164.6 vs 136.2; p = 0.0028) and late stage (day 3-4) (209.4 vs 132.1; p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, early C-reactive protein was associated with BMI (coefficient, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.2-6.5; p < 0.0001) and open surgical procedures (coefficient, 43.1; 95% CI, 27-59.1; p < 0.0001), while late C-reactive protein value was influenced by BMI (coefficient, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.5-7.0; p = 0.0024) and associated extracolonic procedures (coefficient, 34.2; 95% CI, 2.7-65.6; p = 0.033). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values for intra-abdominal complication were 85.9%, 33.6%, 89.3%, and 27.1% for an early C-reactive protein <100 mg/L and 72.7%, 75.4%, 89.4%, and 49.2% for a late C-reactive protein <100 mg/L. Four hundred seven patients with an uneventful postoperative course were discharged at day 8 ± 6.4 with a mean discharge C-reactive protein of 83.5 ± 67.4. Thirty-eight patients (9.3%) were readmitted and had a significantly higher discharge C-reactive protein (138.6 ± 94.1 vs 77.8 ± 61.2, p = 0.0004). Readmission rate was 16.5% for patients with a discharge C-reactive protein >100 mg/L vs 6% with C-reactive protein <100 mg/L (p = 0.0008). For patients included in an enhanced recovery program (discharge at day 4 ± 2.4), the threshold should be higher because discharge is around day 3 or 4. With a C-reactive protein <140, readmission rate was 2% vs 19%, (p = 0.056).
LIMITATIONS
This study includes retrospective data.
CONCLUSION
C-reactive protein <100 mg/L is associated with a lower risk of intra-abdominal complication and readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A749.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30451748
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001216
doi:

Substances chimiques

C-Reactive Protein 9007-41-4

Types de publication

Journal Article Video-Audio Media

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

88-96

Auteurs

Olivier Benoit (O)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Antoine (AP-HP), Paris VI University, Paris, France.

Mathieu Faron (M)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Antoine (AP-HP), Paris VI University, Paris, France.

Nicolas Margot (N)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Antoine (AP-HP), Paris VI University, Paris, France.

Ben Creavin (B)

Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.

Clotilde Debove (C)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Antoine (AP-HP), Paris VI University, Paris, France.

Emmanuel Tiret (E)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Antoine (AP-HP), Paris VI University, Paris, France.

Yann Parc (Y)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Antoine (AP-HP), Paris VI University, Paris, France.

Jérémie H Lefevre (JH)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint Antoine (AP-HP), Paris VI University, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH