Pattern of care in adjuvant therapy for resected Stage I non-small cell lung cancer: real-world data from Japan.
Journal
Japanese journal of clinical oncology
ISSN: 1465-3621
Titre abrégé: Jpn J Clin Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0313225
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2019
01 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
14
08
2018
accepted:
27
10
2018
pubmed:
20
11
2018
medline:
9
2
2019
entrez:
20
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Adjuvant tegafur/uracil (UFT) chemotherapy is recommended for patients with completely resected Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. A Phase III trial, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0707, comparing the survival benefit of UFT and S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) for this population is being conducted. However, the selection of patients in the randomized clinical trial (RCT) may not represent the real-world population. The present study aimed to investigate the pattern of care for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected NSCLC. Patients with completely resected pathological Stage I (T1 > 2 cm and T2 in 6th TNM edition) NSCLC eligible for the JCOG0707 trial but excluded from it during the enrollment period (2008-13) were eligible for this study. Physicians from institutions that participated in the JCOG0707 retrospectively assessed the medical records of each patient. This study enrolled 5006 patients, 85% of those initially considered for participation in the JCOG0707 trial (5006 of 5923 patients). Among them, 2389 were ineligible for the trial and 2617 had not been enrolled despite being eligible. The most frequent reason for non-enrollment despite eligibility was the decline in patients' participation, and the major reasons for trial ineligibility were concomitant malignancy and comorbidities. Of all the patients enrolled in our study, 1659 received adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly UFT. Our study indicates that only 15% of the real-world patients with completely resected NSCLC were enrolled into the adjuvant chemotherapy RCT, and among those not participating in the trial, one-third received adjuvant chemotherapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Adjuvant tegafur/uracil (UFT) chemotherapy is recommended for patients with completely resected Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. A Phase III trial, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0707, comparing the survival benefit of UFT and S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) for this population is being conducted. However, the selection of patients in the randomized clinical trial (RCT) may not represent the real-world population. The present study aimed to investigate the pattern of care for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected NSCLC.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients with completely resected pathological Stage I (T1 > 2 cm and T2 in 6th TNM edition) NSCLC eligible for the JCOG0707 trial but excluded from it during the enrollment period (2008-13) were eligible for this study. Physicians from institutions that participated in the JCOG0707 retrospectively assessed the medical records of each patient.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This study enrolled 5006 patients, 85% of those initially considered for participation in the JCOG0707 trial (5006 of 5923 patients). Among them, 2389 were ineligible for the trial and 2617 had not been enrolled despite being eligible. The most frequent reason for non-enrollment despite eligibility was the decline in patients' participation, and the major reasons for trial ineligibility were concomitant malignancy and comorbidities. Of all the patients enrolled in our study, 1659 received adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly UFT.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study indicates that only 15% of the real-world patients with completely resected NSCLC were enrolled into the adjuvant chemotherapy RCT, and among those not participating in the trial, one-third received adjuvant chemotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30452719
pii: 5185661
doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy165
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
63-68Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn