Effect of Age, Sex, Bolus Volume, and Bolus Consistency on Whiteout Duration in Healthy Subjects During FEES.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Cineradiography
/ methods
Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders
/ diagnostic imaging
Endoscopy
/ methods
Female
Fiber Optic Technology
/ methods
Fluoroscopy
/ methods
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pharynx
/ diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Sex Factors
Tongue
/ diagnostic imaging
Young Adult
Deglutition
Deglutition disorders
FEES
Whiteout
Journal
Dysphagia
ISSN: 1432-0460
Titre abrégé: Dysphagia
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610856
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
31
05
2018
accepted:
14
11
2018
pubmed:
21
11
2018
medline:
23
8
2019
entrez:
21
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One of the major limitations of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is related to the challenging application of temporal measures. Among them, Whiteout (WO) is due to pharyngeal and tongue base contraction and might be used as an estimation of the pharyngeal phase duration. The aims of this study were to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of WO duration and to appraise the effects of age, sex, volume, and texture of the boluses on this temporal measurement. A total of 30 healthy volunteers were recruited. According to their age, the subjects were grouped into three different age groups. Each of them underwent FEES examination with different textures (liquid, semisolid, and solid) and volumes. FEES examinations were video recorded, processed with the software Daisy Viewer 2.0, which allowed the acquisition of 25 frames per second (s) and analyzed by three different raters in order to collect data on WO duration. A total of 863 swallowing acts were video recorded. Intra- and interrater reliability of WO duration were excellent. Both volume and bolus's texture significantly affected WO duration. In particular, WO duration was significantly shorter for the liquid texture than for the semisolid and solids ones. In addition, male subjects scored significantly higher values of WO duration. Finally, WO duration was significantly higher in seniors. WO duration seems to be a reliable temporal measure during FEES examination. WO duration seems to be affected by several factors such as age, sex, volume, and consistency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30456424
doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9961-0
pii: 10.1007/s00455-018-9961-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
192-200Références
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):774.e13-774.e21
pubmed: 26795968
Dysphagia. 2017 Feb;32(1):27-38
pubmed: 28101663
Rev Med Suisse. 2010 Oct 6;6(265):1859-62
pubmed: 21053492
Gastroenterology. 1990 Jun;98(6):1478-84
pubmed: 2338189
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Jul;75(1):33-7
pubmed: 8376283
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Jun;156(6):1181-4
pubmed: 2028863
Dysphagia. 1994 Spring;9(2):101-6
pubmed: 8005004
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Dec;11(6):485-9
pubmed: 14631184
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Oct;43(5):1264-74
pubmed: 11063246
Laryngoscope. 2010 Feb;120(2):306-12
pubmed: 19957345
Arch Neurol. 1992 Dec;49(12):1259-61
pubmed: 1449405
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005 Jun;114(6):478-87
pubmed: 16042106
Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Feb;16(1):37-43
pubmed: 26709466
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998 Nov-Dec;50(6):311-9
pubmed: 9925954
Laryngoscope. 2011 Dec;121(12):2526-34
pubmed: 22081498
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1999;51(3):91-8
pubmed: 10394056
Laryngoscope. 2010 Dec;120(12):2367-73
pubmed: 21108425
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995 Jun;32 Suppl:S107-8
pubmed: 7665279
Dysphagia. 2012 Jun;27(2):162-77
pubmed: 22366761