Risk assessment of copper-containing contraceptives: the impact for women with implanted intrauterine devices during clinical MRI and CT examinations.
Intrauterine devices, copper
Magnetic resonance imaging
Patient safety
Phantoms, imaging
Tomography, X-ray computed
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
13
08
2018
accepted:
25
10
2018
revised:
28
09
2018
pubmed:
21
11
2018
medline:
6
8
2019
entrez:
21
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the risks for implant users with copper-containing intrauterine devices (IUDs) during MR and CT examinations. A tissue-mimicking phantom suitable for all experiments within this study was developed. Seven different types of copper IUDs were evaluated. Heating and dislocation of each IUD were investigated at two clinically relevant positions in 1.5 T and 3 T MR scanners. Artifacts in the field of view caused by each tested IUD were determined for clinical MR and CT imaging. No significant heating of any tested IUD was detected during MR measurements. The temperature increase was less than 0.6 K for all IUDs. Neither angular deflection nor translation of any IUD was detected. Artifacts in MR images were limited to the very vicinity of the IUDs except for one IUD containing a steel-visualizing element. Streaking artifacts in CT were severe (up to 75.5%) in the slices including the IUD. No significant risk possibly harming the patient was determined during this phantom study, deeming MR examinations safe for women with an implanted copper IUD. Image quality was more impaired for CT than for MR imaging and needs careful consideration during diagnosis. • Risk assessment of copper-containing IUDs with regard to heating, dislocation, and artifacts during MR and CT imaging. • Neither significant heating nor dislocation was determined in MR; image quality was more impaired for CT than for MR imaging and needs careful consideration during diagnosis. • The tested IUDs pose no additional risks for implant users during MR and CT examinations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30456586
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5864-6
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5864-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contraceptive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2812-2820Références
Magn Reson Med. 2002 Jan;47(1):187-93
pubmed: 11754458
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Dec;16(6):721-32
pubmed: 12451586
Radiographics. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):1679-91
pubmed: 15537976
Med Phys. 2005 Oct;32(10):3199-208
pubmed: 16279073
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jan;27(1):60-6
pubmed: 16418357
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006 Apr;220(3):413-24
pubmed: 16808074
Radiographics. 2007 May-Jun;27(3):791-803
pubmed: 17495293
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Jan;65(1):29-35
pubmed: 18162353
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Aug;60(2):312-9
pubmed: 18666101
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009 May;223(4):497-514
pubmed: 19499839
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49963
pubmed: 23185498
Korean J Radiol. 2013 May-Jun;14(3):416-22
pubmed: 23690707
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Oct;74(4):999-1010
pubmed: 25293952
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Nov;44(5):1360-1367
pubmed: 27043243
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jul;78(1):215-225
pubmed: 27521026
Z Med Phys. 2017 Jun;27(2):124-131
pubmed: 27596568
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Oct;78(4):1558-1565
pubmed: 27797157
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):568-581
pubmed: 28266079
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):14-21
pubmed: 29038071
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Oct;80(4):1676-1685
pubmed: 29468721
Phys Med Biol. 2018 May 04;63(9):095015
pubmed: 29637905
Radiology. 1987 Feb;162(2):311-4
pubmed: 3797642
Eur Radiol. 1996;6(1):66-8
pubmed: 8797953
Contraception. 1997 Mar;55(3):169-73
pubmed: 9115006