Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders.
Psychometrics
Rasch model
Shoulder pain and disability index
Journal
Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-2649
Titre abrégé: Qual Life Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9210257
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
accepted:
11
11
2018
pubmed:
21
11
2018
medline:
29
3
2019
entrez:
21
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The psychometric properties of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) have been extensively evaluated using classical test theory, but very few studies have applied Rasch analysis. The purpose of this study was to validate the Danish version using Rasch analysis. Responses to the SPADI from 229 patients (48% female, mean age 54.5) were included in the Rasch analysis. Overall fit, individual item fit, local response dependence, dimensionality, targeting, reliability, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined. After iterative analyses, good fit to the Rasch model was observed, with acceptable targeting and uni-dimensionality. SPADI should be reported as two separate subscales: Pain and Functional Disability. The pain subscale initially demonstrated misfit due to local dependence and DIF, but a log linear Rasch model showed good fit to the Rasch model with acceptable targeting and uni-dimensionality. A six-item version of the disability subscale exhibited adequate fit in the Danish version. The same items were also found to fit the Rasch model in the English version. The measurement properties of the Danish SPADI are similar to those of the English version. SPADI should be reported as two separate subscales. For the pain subscale, DIF with respect to age was disclosed, but the impact was small. The eight-item disability subscale did not fit the Rasch model. A six-item version of the disability subscale exhibited adequate fit in the Danish version. The same items were also found to fit the Rasch model in the English version.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30456715
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2052-8
pii: 10.1007/s11136-018-2052-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
795-800Références
Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Dec;4(4):143-9
pubmed: 11188601
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S134-42
pubmed: 17060820
Br J Clin Psychol. 2007 Mar;46(Pt 1):1-18
pubmed: 17472198
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 May 15;61(5):623-32
pubmed: 19405008
Clin Rehabil. 2013 Apr;27(4):355-60
pubmed: 22879572
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Nov 21;7:195-203
pubmed: 27920590
J Rheumatol. 2017 Dec;44(12):1880-1883
pubmed: 28089972
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Feb;70(2):252-259
pubmed: 28388821
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):302
pubmed: 28716019
Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):389-400
pubmed: 29188484
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 23;6:e4400
pubmed: 29492342
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Aug;26(8):2505-2511
pubmed: 29550858
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):178-194
pubmed: 29881087