'Pre-launch' finite element analysis of a short-stem total hip arthroplasty system consisting of two implant types.


Journal

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
ISSN: 1879-1271
Titre abrégé: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611877

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 18 02 2018
revised: 03 11 2018
accepted: 06 11 2018
pubmed: 21 11 2018
medline: 12 2 2020
entrez: 21 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We applied a previously established and validated numerical model to a novel short-stemmed implant for a 'pre-launch' investigation. The implant system consists of two different implant geometries for valgus/varus-positioned proximal femurs with differences in volume distribution, head/neck angle, and calcar alignment. The aim of the design was to achieve a better adaption to the anatomic conditions, resulting in a favourable load transfer. The implant type G showed the best fit to our model, but both stem geometries were implanted; the implant type B was used to compute an 'imperfection scenario'. Apparent bone density decreased by 4.3% in the entire femur with the implant type G, and by 12.3% with the implant type B. Bone mass loss was pronounced in the proximal calcar region. Apparent bone density increased at the lateral cortical ring and in the minor trochanter. The apparent bone density in the imperfection scenario was very similar to that of a straight stem, indicating a distal load transfer. No adverse effects of the A2 short-stemmed implant system on bone remodeling could be detected. The overall bone density reduction was acceptable, and wedge fixation was not observed, indicating that there was no distal load transfer. The simulation of an incongruous implant indicates the sensitivity of our model in response to modifications of implant positioning. Correct implant selection and positioning is crucial when using the A2 system.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
We applied a previously established and validated numerical model to a novel short-stemmed implant for a 'pre-launch' investigation.
METHODS
The implant system consists of two different implant geometries for valgus/varus-positioned proximal femurs with differences in volume distribution, head/neck angle, and calcar alignment. The aim of the design was to achieve a better adaption to the anatomic conditions, resulting in a favourable load transfer. The implant type G showed the best fit to our model, but both stem geometries were implanted; the implant type B was used to compute an 'imperfection scenario'.
FINDINGS
Apparent bone density decreased by 4.3% in the entire femur with the implant type G, and by 12.3% with the implant type B. Bone mass loss was pronounced in the proximal calcar region. Apparent bone density increased at the lateral cortical ring and in the minor trochanter. The apparent bone density in the imperfection scenario was very similar to that of a straight stem, indicating a distal load transfer.
INTERPRETATION
No adverse effects of the A2 short-stemmed implant system on bone remodeling could be detected. The overall bone density reduction was acceptable, and wedge fixation was not observed, indicating that there was no distal load transfer. The simulation of an incongruous implant indicates the sensitivity of our model in response to modifications of implant positioning. Correct implant selection and positioning is crucial when using the A2 system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30458330
pii: S0268-0033(18)30050-0
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.11.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

31-37

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Matthias Lerch (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries Straße 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: Matthias.lerch@diakovere.de.

Henning Windhagen (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries Straße 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: henning.windhagen@diakovere.de.

Agnes-Elisabeth Kurtz (AE)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries Straße 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: agneselisabeth.kurtz@diakovere.de.

Stefan Budde (S)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries Straße 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: stefan.budde@diakovere.de.

Bernd-Arno Behrens (BA)

Institute of Forming Technology and Machines, Leibniz University Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany. Electronic address: behrens@ifum.uni-hannover.de.

Anas Bouguecha (A)

Institute of Forming Technology and Machines, Leibniz University Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany; Laboratory La2MP, ENIS, National school of engineering in Gafsa, Sfax, Tunisia.

Amer Almohallami (A)

Institute of Forming Technology and Machines, Leibniz University Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany; PROFIL Verbindungstechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 22-24, 61381 Friedrichsdorf, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH