Mesh Sensitivity Analysis for Quantitative Shear Stress Assessment in Blood Pumps Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.

blood trauma computational fluid dynamics (CFD) hemodynamics hemolysis mesh sensitivity shear stress ventricular assist device (VAD) wall functions

Journal

Journal of biomechanical engineering
ISSN: 1528-8951
Titre abrégé: J Biomech Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7909584

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 18 05 2018
pubmed: 21 11 2018
medline: 21 11 2018
entrez: 21 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The reduction of excessive, nonphysiologic shear stresses leading to blood trauma can be the key to overcome many of the associated complications in blood recirculating devices. In that regard, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are gaining in importance for the hydraulic and hemocompatibility assessment. Still, direct hemolysis assessments with CFD remain inaccurate and limited to qualitative comparisons rather than quantitative predictions. An underestimated quantity for improved blood damage prediction accuracy is the influence of near-wall mesh resolution on shear stress quantification in regions of complex flows. This study investigated the necessary mesh refinement to quantify shear stress for two selected, meshing sensitive hotspots within a rotary centrifugal blood pump (the blade leading edge and tip clearance gap). The shear stress in these regions is elevated due to presence of stagnation points and the flow around a sharp edge. The nondimensional mesh characteristic number y+, which is known in the context of turbulence modeling, underestimated the maximum wall shear stress by 60% on average with the recommended value of 1, but was found to be exact below 0.1. To evaluate the meshing related error on the numerical hemolysis prediction, three-dimensional simulations of a generic centrifugal pump were performed with mesh sizes from 3 × 106 to 30 × 106 elements. The respective hemolysis was calculated using an Eulerian scalar transport model. Mesh insensitivity was found below a maximum y+ of 0.2 necessitating 18 × 106 mesh elements. A meshing related error of up to 25% was found for the coarser meshes. Further investigations need to address: (1) the transferability to other geometries and (2) potential adaptions on blood damage estimation models to allow better quantitative predictions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30458464
pii: 2716675
doi: 10.1115/1.4042043
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 by ASME.

Auteurs

Sascha Gross-Hardt (S)

Department of Cardiovascular Engineering,Institute of Applied Medical Engineering,Helmholtz Institute,RWTH Aachen University,Pauwelsstrasse 20,Aachen 52074, Germany.
Enmodes GmbH,Aachen 52074, Germanye-mail: gross-hardt@ame.rwth-aachen.de.

Fiete Boehning (F)

Department of Cardiovascular Engineering,Institute of Applied Medical Engineering,Helmholtz Institute,RWTH Aachen University,Pauwelsstrasse 20,Aachen 52074, Germany.
Enmodes GmbH,Aachen 52074, Germanye-mail: boehning@enmodes.de.

Ulrich Steinseifer (U)

Department of Cardiovascular Engineering,Institute of Applied Medical Engineering,Helmholtz Institute,RWTH Aachen University,Pauwelsstrasse 20,Aachen 52074, Germany.
Department of Mechanical andAerospace Engineering,Monash Institute of Medical Engineering,Monash University,Melbourne 3800, Australiae-mail: steinseifer@ame.rwth-aachen.de.

Thomas Schmitz-Rode (T)

Department of Cardiovascular Engineering,Institute of Applied Medical Engineering,Helmholtz Institute,RWTH Aachen University,Pauwelsstrasse 20,Aachen 52074, Germanye-mail: smiro@ame.rwth-aachen.de.

Tim A S Kaufmann (TAS)

Department of Cardiovascular Engineering,Institute of Applied Medical Engineering,Helmholtz Institute,RWTH Aachen University,Pauwelsstrasse 20,Aachen 52074, Germany.
Enmodes GmbH,Aachen 52074, Germanye-mail: kaufmann@ame.rwth-aachen.de.

Classifications MeSH