Deciphering the molecular effects of romidepsin on germ cell tumours: DHRS2 is involved in cell cycle arrest but not apoptosis or induction of romidepsin effectors.


Journal

Journal of cellular and molecular medicine
ISSN: 1582-4934
Titre abrégé: J Cell Mol Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101083777

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 20 08 2018
revised: 31 08 2018
accepted: 25 09 2018
pubmed: 22 11 2018
medline: 16 4 2020
entrez: 22 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs) mostly affect young men at age 17-40. Although high cure rates can be achieved by orchiectomy and chemotherapy, GCTs can still be a lethal threat to young patients with metastases or therapy resistance. Thus, alternative treatment options are needed. Based on studies utilising GCT cell lines, the histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin is a promising therapeutic option, showing high toxicity at very low doses towards cisplatin-resistant GCT cells, but not fibroblasts or Sertoli cells. In this study, we extended our analysis of the molecular effects of romidepsin to deepen our understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Patients will benefit from these analyses, since detailed knowledge of the romidepsin effects allows for a better risk and side-effect assessment. We screened for changes in histone acetylation of specific lysine residues and analysed changes in the DNA methylation landscape after romidepsin treatment of the GCT cell lines TCam-2, 2102EP, NCCIT and JAR, while human fibroblasts were used as controls. In addition, we focused on the role of the dehydrogenase/reductase DHRS2, which was strongly up-regulated in romidepsin treated cells, by generating DHRS2-deficient TCam-2 cells using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. We show that DHRS2 is dispensable for up-regulation of romidepsin effectors (GADD45B, DUSP1, ZFP36, ATF3, FOS, CDKN1A, ID2) but contributes to induction of cell cycle arrest. Finally, we show that a combinatory treatment of romidepsin plus the gluccocorticoid dexamethasone further boosts expression of the romidepsin effectors and reduces viability of GCT cells more strongly than under single agent treatment. Thus, romidepsin and dexamethasone might represent a new combinatorial approach for treatment of GCT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30460772
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13971
pmc: PMC6307807
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic 0
Depsipeptides 0
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors 0
Dexamethasone 7S5I7G3JQL
romidepsin CX3T89XQBK
Carbonyl Reductase (NADPH) EC 1.1.1.184
DHRS2 protein, human EC 1.1.1.184
Cisplatin Q20Q21Q62J

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

670-679

Informations de copyright

© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Endocr Rev. 2000 Feb;21(1):55-89
pubmed: 10696570
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Mar;5(3):210-22
pubmed: 15738984
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 17;100(24):1792-803
pubmed: 19066270
Cell Tissue Res. 2008 Feb;331(2):529-38
pubmed: 18008088
Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 Sep;75(9):1484-94
pubmed: 18271004
Nat Genet. 1998 Jun;19(2):187-91
pubmed: 9620779
J Cell Mol Med. 2019 Jan;23(1):670-679
pubmed: 30460772
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 15;7(46):74931-74946
pubmed: 27572311
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 2;101(44):15603-8
pubmed: 15501915
Mol Pharmacol. 2005 Dec;68(6):1852-62
pubmed: 16186250
PLoS Genet. 2015 Jul 30;11(7):e1005415
pubmed: 26226633
J Clin Invest. 2010 Oct;120(10):3594-605
pubmed: 20811155
Endocr Rev. 1984 Winter;5(1):25-44
pubmed: 6368214
Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Aug;30(16):3981-93
pubmed: 20547751
Mol Cancer Ther. 2003 Feb;2(2):151-63
pubmed: 12589032
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99625
pubmed: 24926665
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 26;7(30):47095-47110
pubmed: 27283990
Mol Cancer Ther. 2006 May;5(5):1309-17
pubmed: 16731764
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011 Dec;50(12):1033-42
pubmed: 21987446
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e82881
pubmed: 24386123
BMC Med Genomics. 2009 Nov 30;2:67
pubmed: 19948057
Genome Res. 2009 Dec;19(12):2163-71
pubmed: 19801529
Histopathology. 2016 Jul;69(1):7-10
pubmed: 26918959
J Cell Mol Med. 2017 Jul;21(7):1300-1314
pubmed: 28026145
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 1;31(25):3076-82
pubmed: 23897970

Auteurs

Daniel Nettersheim (D)

Department of Urology, Urological Research Lab, Translational Urooncology, University Medical School Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Daniel Berger (D)

Department of Developmental Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Medical School Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Sina Jostes (S)

Department of Developmental Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Medical School Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Margaretha Skowron (M)

Department of Urology, Urological Research Lab, Translational Urooncology, University Medical School Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Hubert Schorle (H)

Department of Developmental Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Medical School Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH