Airway management research: a systematic review.

airway management airway research bibliometrics difficult airway

Journal

Anaesthesia
ISSN: 1365-2044
Titre abrégé: Anaesthesia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370524

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
accepted: 10 09 2018
pubmed: 22 11 2018
medline: 22 3 2019
entrez: 22 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recent controversy regarding the ethics of conducting airway research in patients led to disagreements concerning the value and frequency of manikin-based investigation. However, no formal examination of the methodology of airway research has been undertaken. We, therefore, performed a systematic bibliometric review of airway management research to describe the conduct, quantify the subjects (patient vs. manikin vs. other), assess the reported outcomes and map global trends. We retrieved 1505 relevant studies published between 2006 and 2017, together recruiting 359,648 subjects, of which 341,233 were patients, the remaining being volunteers or subjects managing manikins, human cadavers, animals or bench models. There were 701 randomised controlled clinical trials (46.6%), 83 non-randomised experimental clinical trials (5.5%), 298 observational studies (19.8%) and 423 non-patient studies (28.1%). A total of 1082 studies (71.9%) were patient studies and 322 were manikin studies (21.4%). The total annual number of airway management studies increased over time, as did the annual number of patient studies, but there was no significant increase in the annual number of manikin studies over time. Of the patient studies, subject baseline characteristics were most likely to be ASA status 1-2 (n = 531, 49.1%), populations were most often elective surgical patients (n = 918, 84.8%) and the most common interventions studied were tracheal intubation (n = 820, 54.4%) or supraglottic airway device insertion (n = 257, 17.1%). There was a total of 77 different primary outcomes used in the included studies, the most commonly reported being success rate and procedure time. By understanding how and what has been previously studied these data can be used to form the basis for future priority setting exercises, core outcome set development, and could inform strategy on the future directions of airway management research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30460982
doi: 10.1111/anae.14471
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

225-236

Informations de copyright

© 2018 Association of Anaesthetists.

Auteurs

I Ahmad (I)

Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College London, UK.

D N Onwochei (DN)

Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

S Muldoon (S)

Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

O Keane (O)

Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

K El-Boghdadly (K)

Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH