Anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy versus docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Anthracyclines
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
/ methods
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Disease-Free Survival
Docetaxel
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Receptor, ErbB-2
Taxoids
/ therapeutic use
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Anthracyclines
Breast cancer
Taxanes
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
14
09
2018
accepted:
16
11
2018
pubmed:
23
11
2018
medline:
10
7
2019
entrez:
23
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Standard adjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer consists generally in an anthracycline and taxane-based regimen (A+T). The TC (docetaxel and cyclophosphamide) regimen arises as a potential alternative, although individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of TC over A+T. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing 6 cycles of TC versus sequential A+T in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer. A systematic literature search was performed to identify RCTs comparing TC versus A+T. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Subgroup analyses of DFS according to hormone receptor status, lymph node involvement, and menopausal status were performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DFS and OS were extracted from each trial, and a pooled analysis was conducted using the random-effect model. The Higgins' I-Squared Test was used to quantify heterogeneity. Seven RCTs were included (12,741 patients). Overall, no difference was observed between TC and A+T in DFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.96-1.20) and OS (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.90-1.22). A trend favoring A+T was observed in hormone receptor-negative (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.93-1.34) and N2 patients (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.82-1.90). Emesis/vomiting, mucositis, thrombocytopenia and sensory neuropathy were significantly more frequent with A+T. As adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer, sequential A+T regimen was associated with increased risk of toxicities and no clear survival benefit as compared to 6 cycles of TC. Higher-risk patients may benefit the most from A+T, whilst TC may be an efficacious and less toxic alternative for lower-risk patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30465156
doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5055-9
pii: 10.1007/s10549-018-5055-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anthracyclines
0
Taxoids
0
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM