Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) of Hepatic Malignancy: A Bi-institutional Analysis of Safety and Outcomes.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bile Duct Neoplasms
/ pathology
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ pathology
Catheter Ablation
/ instrumentation
Cholangiocarcinoma
/ pathology
Disease Progression
Electroporation
/ instrumentation
Equipment Safety
Female
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
/ pathology
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Progression-Free Survival
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasonography
Hepatic malignancy
Irreversible electroporation
Tumour ablation
Journal
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
ISSN: 1432-086X
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003538
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
28
03
2018
accepted:
09
11
2018
pubmed:
23
11
2018
medline:
26
4
2019
entrez:
23
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal ablative option in patients unsuitable for standard thermal ablation, due to its potential to preserve collagenous structures (vessels and ducts) and a reduced susceptibility to heat sink effects. In this series from two large tertiary referral hepatobiliary centres, we aim to assess the safety/outcomes of hepatic IRE. Bi-institutional retrospective, longitudinal follow-up series of IRE for primary hepatic malignancy; [hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 20), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 3)] and secondary metastatic disease; colorectal (n = 28), neuroendocrine (n = 1), pancreatic (n = 1), breast (n = 1), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST, n = 1) and malignant thymoma (n = 1). Outcome measures included procedural safety/effectiveness, time to progression and time to death. Between 2013 and 2017, 52 patients underwent percutaneous IRE of 59 liver tumours in 53 sessions. All tumours were deemed unsuitable for thermal ablation. Cases were performed using ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) guidance. A complete ablation was achieved in n = 44, (75%) of cases with an overall complication rate of 17% (n = 9). Of the complete ablation group, median time to progression was 8 months. At 12 months, 44% were progression-free (95% CI 30-66%). The data suggest that larger lesion size (> 2 cm) is associated with shorter time to progression and there is highly significant difference with faster time to progression in mCRC compared with HCC. Median survival time was 38 months. This bi-institutional review is the largest UK series of IRE and suggests this ablative technology can be a useful tool, but appears to mainly induce local tumour control rather than cure with HCC having better outcomes than mCRC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30465255
doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2120-z
pii: 10.1007/s00270-018-2120-z
pmc: PMC6394503
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
577-583Références
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jul;25(7):997-1011; quiz 1011
pubmed: 24656178
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May;208(5):1141-1146
pubmed: 28177652
World J Hepatol. 2015 May 18;7(8):1054-63
pubmed: 26052394
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 01;6:23781
pubmed: 27032535
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):1141-1146
pubmed: 28584945
Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;70(4):1555-63
pubmed: 20124486
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013 Mar;30(1):49-55
pubmed: 24436517
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Sep;18(3):176-82
pubmed: 26365548
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 22;7:44821
pubmed: 28327623
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Mar;50(5):912-9
pubmed: 24411080
Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):335-45
pubmed: 12893895
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;31(2):294-301
pubmed: 26114968
Ann Oncol. 2009 Jun;20 Suppl 7:vii1-vii6
pubmed: 19497945
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013 Mar;30(1):67-73
pubmed: 24436519
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:5582-5
pubmed: 23367194
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 01;8(11):e76260
pubmed: 24223700
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Sep;13(9):e252-65
pubmed: 21689362
Radiology. 2016 Jan;278(1):285-94
pubmed: 26523493
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 May;26(5):694-702
pubmed: 25812712
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1872-1879
pubmed: 30017817
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Aug;6(4):275-86
pubmed: 17668934
Am J Surg. 2016 Oct;212(4):715-721
pubmed: 27712669
HPB (Oxford). 2011 Mar;13(3):168-73
pubmed: 21309933
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Dec;4(6):699-705
pubmed: 16292891
Rofo. 2016 Aug;188(8):735-45
pubmed: 27074423
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014 Oct;3(5):317-23
pubmed: 25392844