Surgical management of lower-grade glioma in the spotlight of the 2016 WHO classification system.
Adolescent
Adult
Brain Neoplasms
/ classification
Child
Chromosome Deletion
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1
/ genetics
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19
/ genetics
Glioma
/ classification
Humans
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
/ genetics
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Middle Aged
Mutation
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
World Health Organization
Young Adult
1p/19q
Astrocytoma
Gross total resection
IDH-mutation
Lower-grade gliomas
Oligodendroglioma
WHO-classification
Journal
Journal of neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1573-7373
Titre abrégé: J Neurooncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
29
07
2018
accepted:
07
10
2018
pubmed:
24
11
2018
medline:
16
4
2019
entrez:
24
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
According to the 2016 WHO classification lower-grade gliomas consist of three groups: IDH-mutated and 1p/19q co-deleted, IDH-mutated and IDH-wildtype tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical therapy for lower-grade gliomas with a particular focus on the molecular subgroups. This is a bi-centric retrospective analysis including 299 patients, who underwent treatment for lower-grade glioma between 1990 and 2016. All tumors were re-classified according to the 2016 WHO classification. Data concerning baseline and tumor characteristics, overall survival, different treatment modalities and functional outcome were analyzed. A total of 112 (37.5%) patients with IDH-mutation and 1p/19q co-deletetion, 86 (28.8%) patients with IDH-mutation and 101 (33.8%) patients with IDH-wildtype tumors were identified. The median overall survival (mOS) differed significantly between the groups (p < 0.001). Surgical resection was performed in 226 patients and showed significantly improved mOS compared to the biopsy group (p = 0.001). Gross total resection (GTR) was associated with better survival (p = 0.007) in the whole cohort as well as in the IDH-mutated and IDH-wildtype groups compared to partial resection or biopsy. IDH-wildtype patients presented a significant survival benefit after combined radio-chemotherapy compared to radio- or chemotherapy alone (p = 0.02). Good clinical status (NANO) was associated with longer OS (p = 0.001). The impact of surgical treatment on the outcome of lower-grade gliomas depends to a great extent on the molecular subtype of the tumors. Patients with more aggressive tumors (IDH-wildtype) seem to profit from more intensive treatment like GTR, multiple resections and combined radio-/chemotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30467813
doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-03030-w
pii: 10.1007/s11060-018-03030-w
doi:
Substances chimiques
IDH2 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.41
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
IDH1 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.42.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
223-233Références
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1338-45
pubmed: 18323558
Neurosurgery. 2008 Apr;62(4):753-64; discussion 264-6
pubmed: 18496181
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5743-50
pubmed: 19805672
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(6):583-93
pubmed: 21474379
J Neurosurg. 2011 Aug;115(2):240-4
pubmed: 21529134
Neurosurgery. 2012 Apr;70(4):921-8; discussion 928
pubmed: 21997540
J Neurosurg. 2012 Feb;116(2):365-72
pubmed: 21999317
J Neurosurg. 2011 Nov;115(5):948-65
pubmed: 22043865
JAMA. 2012 Nov 14;308(18):1881-8
pubmed: 23099483
J Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;118(6):1157-68
pubmed: 23495881
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Feb;156(2):327-37
pubmed: 24264163
Cancer J. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):66-72
pubmed: 24445767
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):e395-403
pubmed: 25079102
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Mar;17(3):332-42
pubmed: 25087230
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014 Oct;95(10):945-55
pubmed: 25218490
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Apr;129(4):585-96
pubmed: 25701198
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 May;129(5):679-93
pubmed: 25783747
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2481-98
pubmed: 26061751
Oncotarget. 2015 Oct 6;6(30):30295-305
pubmed: 26210286
J Neurooncol. 2015 Dec;125(3):531-49
pubmed: 26530263
Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;134:267-85
pubmed: 26948360
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
J Neurooncol. 2016 Nov;130(2):289-298
pubmed: 27161250
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Nov;18(11):1529-1537
pubmed: 27370396
J Neurooncol. 2016 Sep;129(3):505-514
pubmed: 27401154
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 30;6:32286
pubmed: 27574036
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1521-1532
pubmed: 27686946
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;127(1):123-131
pubmed: 27689459
Neuro Oncol. 2017 May 1;19(5):614-624
pubmed: 28339700
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:265-274
pubmed: 28408263
Neuro Oncol. 2017 May 1;19(5):625-635
pubmed: 28453751
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1942-1948
pubmed: 28475680
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):e315-e329
pubmed: 28483413
J Neurooncol. 2017 Aug;134(1):65-74
pubmed: 28527004
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1327-1337
pubmed: 28575485
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 20;35(21):2394-2401
pubmed: 28640702
CNS Oncol. 2017 Jul 18;:null
pubmed: 28718304
Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1645-1653
pubmed: 28801186
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jan 10;20(1):103-112
pubmed: 29016833