Radiologist performance in the detection of lung cancer using CT.


Journal

Clinical radiology
ISSN: 1365-229X
Titre abrégé: Clin Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1306016

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 20 04 2018
accepted: 16 10 2018
pubmed: 25 11 2018
medline: 28 10 2019
entrez: 25 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To measure the level of radiologists' performance in lung cancer detection, and to explore radiologists' performance in cancer specialised and non-specialised centres. Thirty radiologists read 60 chest computed tomography (CT) examinations. Thirty cases had surgically or biopsy-proven lung cancer and 30 were cancer-free cases. The cancer cases were validated by four expert radiologists who located the malignant lung nodules. Reader performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, location sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). In addition, sensitivity at fixed specificity (0.794) was computed from each reader's estimated ROC curve. The radiologists had a mean sensitivity of 0.749, sensitivity at fixed specificity of 0.744, location sensitivity of 0.666, specificity of 0.81 and AUC of 0.846. Radiologists in the specialised and non-specialised cancer centres had the following (specialised, non-specialised) pairs of values: sensitivity=(0.80, 0.719); sensitivity for fixed 0.794 specificity=(0.752, 0.740); location sensitivity=(0.712, 0.637); specificity=(0.794, 0.82) and AUC=(0.846, 0.846). The efficacy of radiologists was comparable to other studies. Furthermore, AUC outcomes were similar for specialised and non-specialised cancer centre radiologists, suggesting they have similar discriminatory ability and that the higher sensitivity and lower specificity for specialised-centre radiologists can be attributed to them being less conservative in interpreting case images.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30470412
pii: S0009-9260(18)30574-9
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.10.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

67-75

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

B Al Mohammad (B)

Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Cumberland Campus, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia. Electronic address: baal8200@uni.sydney.edu.au.

S L Hillis (SL)

Departments of Radiology and Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, 3170 ML, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242-1077, USA.

W Reed (W)

Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Cumberland Campus, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.

M Alakhras (M)

Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Cumberland Campus, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.

P C Brennan (PC)

Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Cumberland Campus, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH