Reliability and Agreement of Various InBody Body Composition Analyzers as Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Men and Women.
Bioimpedance
body fat percent
fat free mass
fat mass
Journal
Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
ISSN: 1094-6950
Titre abrégé: J Clin Densitom
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9808212
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
28
09
2018
revised:
27
10
2018
accepted:
30
10
2018
pubmed:
26
11
2018
medline:
16
9
2021
entrez:
26
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bioelectrical impedance analysis has evolved over the years to include the use of multiple frequencies and impedance measurements to improve the accuracy and reliability of body composition estimates. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the reliability of the InBody A total of 31 males and 36 females participated in 2 d of testing separated by 24-72 h. Each visit consisted of a DXA scan, and analysis with the InBody All 3 bioelectrical impedance devices (InBody The InBody analyzers produce small individual error, which suggest these methods can be used as a surrogate when DXA is not available; however, practitioners should be aware of the systematic bias for all comparisons and proportional bias for FM in women and FFM in men. Furthermore, findings revealed that the research grade models, InBody
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Bioelectrical impedance analysis has evolved over the years to include the use of multiple frequencies and impedance measurements to improve the accuracy and reliability of body composition estimates. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the reliability of the InBody
METHODS
A total of 31 males and 36 females participated in 2 d of testing separated by 24-72 h. Each visit consisted of a DXA scan, and analysis with the InBody
RESULTS
All 3 bioelectrical impedance devices (InBody
CONCLUSION
The InBody analyzers produce small individual error, which suggest these methods can be used as a surrogate when DXA is not available; however, practitioners should be aware of the systematic bias for all comparisons and proportional bias for FM in women and FFM in men. Furthermore, findings revealed that the research grade models, InBody
Identifiants
pubmed: 30472111
pii: S1094-6950(18)30221-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
443-450Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.