Similarities and differences in the reproductive phenotypes of women with congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism caused by GNRHR mutations and women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Does the phenotype of women with normosmic congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (nCHH) and pituitary resistance to GnRH caused by biallelic mutations in the GnRH receptor (GNRHR) (nCHH/bi-GNRHR) differ from that of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? Women with nCHH/bi-GNRHR have variable pubertal development but nearly all have primary amenorrhea and an exaggerated LH response to GnRH stimulation, similar to that seen in women with PCOS. Women with nCHH/bi-GNRHR are very rare and their phenotype at diagnosis is not always adequately documented. The results of gonadotrophin stimulation by acute GnRH challenge test and ovarian features have not been directly compared between these patients and women with PCOS. We describe the phenotypic spectrum at nCHH/bi-GNRHR diagnosis in a series of 12 women. Their reproductive characteristics and acute responses to GnRH were compared to those of 70 women with PCOS. Patients and controls (healthy female volunteers aged over 18 years) were enrolled in a single French referral centre. Evaluation included clinical and hormonal studies, pelvic ultrasonography and GnRH challenge test. We also functionally characterized two missense GNRHR mutations found in two new consanguineous families. Breast development was highly variable at nCHH/bi-GNRHR diagnosis, but only one patient had undeveloped breasts. Primary amenorrhea was present in all but two cases. In untreated nCHH/bi-GNRHR patients, uterine height (UH) correlated (P = 0.01) with the circulating estradiol level and was shorter than in 23 nulliparous post-pubertal age-matched controls (P < 0.0001) and than in 15 teenagers with PCOS under 20-years-old (P < 0.0001) in which PCOS was revealed by primary amenorrhea or primary-secondary amenorrhea. Unexpectedly, the stimulated LH peak response in nCHH/bi-GNRHR patients was variable, and often normal or exaggerated. Interestingly, the LH peak response was similar to that seen in the PCOS patients, but the latter women had significantly larger mean ovarian volume (P < 0.001) and uterine length (P < 0.001) and higher mean estradiol (P < 0.001), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) (P = 0.02) and inhibin-B (P < 0.001) levels. In the two new consaguineous families, the affected nCHH/bi-GNRHR women carried the T269M or Y290F GNRHR missense mutation in the homozygous state. In vitro analysis of GnRHR showed complete or partial loss-of-function of the T269M and Y290F mutants compared to their wildtype counterpart. The number of nCHH/bi-GNRHR patients reported here is small. As this disorder is very rare, an international study would be necessary to recruit a larger cohort and consolidate the phenotypic spectrum observed here. In teenagers and young women with primary amenorrhea, significant breast and uterine development does not rule out CHH caused by biallelic GNRHR mutations. In rare patients with PCOS presenting with primary amenorrhea and a mild phenotype, the similar exaggerated pituitary LH responses to GnRH in PCOS and nCHH/bi-GNRHR patients could lead to diagnostic errors. This challenge test should therefore not be recommended. As indicated by consensus and guidelines, careful analysis of clinical presentation and measurements of testosterone circulating levels remain the basis of PCOS diagnosis. Also, analysis of ovarian volume, UH and of inhibin-B, AMH, estradiol and androgen circulating levels could help to distinguish between mild PCOS and nCHH/bi-GNRHR. This study was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR) grant ANR-09-GENO-017 KALGENOPATH, France; and by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) grant PRIN 2012227FLF_004, Italy. The authors declare no conflict of interest.