[Participation in self-help groups: impact on self-management and knowledge].

Teilnahme an Selbsthilfegruppen: Wirkungen auf Selbstmanagement und Wissenserwerb.

Journal

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
ISSN: 1437-1588
Titre abrégé: Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101181368

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 28 11 2018
medline: 13 9 2019
entrez: 28 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Self-help groups (SHGs) are an inherent part of patient involvement and play an important role in the healthcare system. Until now, however, there has been a lack of systematic investigations and quantitative data about the individual impact of self-help for patients and relatives. This study presents the results of a comparison between members of SHGs and non-members. Thereby, the effects of self-help shall be described in terms of empowerment and self-management. The study is part of the project "Health-related Collective Self-Help in Germany" (Gesundheitsbezogene Selbsthilfe in Deutschland-SHILD) funded by the Federal Ministry of Health. The study was conducted with patients from five therapeutic areas (diabetes mellitus type 2, prostate cancer, multiple sclerosis, tinnitus, relatives of dementia patients). Participants administered a multidimensional questionnaire (paper-and-pencil or online). Of the 2870 participants in this analysis, 49% were active members of SHGs. Statistical analysis showed some significant, but small differences between the two groups in five out of seven scales of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) in favour of the SHG members. Furthermore, SHG members performed better in specific knowledge tests. Members see the importance of their group especially in social inclusion, psychosocial relief, coping with the disease and new insights in dealing with the disease. With respect to the study design we cannot rule out that differences might be based on personal characteristics influencing the decision to participate in a SHG or not. But as the results are controlled for confounders, the hypothesis that SHG participation has a positive impact on the outcomes rather than vice versa seems supported.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Self-help groups (SHGs) are an inherent part of patient involvement and play an important role in the healthcare system. Until now, however, there has been a lack of systematic investigations and quantitative data about the individual impact of self-help for patients and relatives.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
This study presents the results of a comparison between members of SHGs and non-members. Thereby, the effects of self-help shall be described in terms of empowerment and self-management. The study is part of the project "Health-related Collective Self-Help in Germany" (Gesundheitsbezogene Selbsthilfe in Deutschland-SHILD) funded by the Federal Ministry of Health.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
The study was conducted with patients from five therapeutic areas (diabetes mellitus type 2, prostate cancer, multiple sclerosis, tinnitus, relatives of dementia patients). Participants administered a multidimensional questionnaire (paper-and-pencil or online). Of the 2870 participants in this analysis, 49% were active members of SHGs.
RESULTS RESULTS
Statistical analysis showed some significant, but small differences between the two groups in five out of seven scales of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) in favour of the SHG members. Furthermore, SHG members performed better in specific knowledge tests. Members see the importance of their group especially in social inclusion, psychosocial relief, coping with the disease and new insights in dealing with the disease.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
With respect to the study design we cannot rule out that differences might be based on personal characteristics influencing the decision to participate in a SHG or not. But as the results are controlled for confounders, the hypothesis that SHG participation has a positive impact on the outcomes rather than vice versa seems supported.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30478487
doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2850-8
pii: 10.1007/s00103-018-2850-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

ger

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10-16

Auteurs

Stefan Nickel (S)

Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. nickel@uke.de.

Marius Haack (M)

Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.

Olaf von dem Knesebeck (O)

Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Marie-Luise Dierks (ML)

Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.

Gabriele Seidel (G)

Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.

Silke Werner (S)

Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Christopher Kofahl (C)

Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH