A protocol to transfer a fed-batch platform process into semi-perfusion mode: The benefit of automated small-scale bioreactors compared to shake flasks as scale-down model.

DoE continuous mammalian cell cultivation mAb process optimization small-scale bioreactor

Journal

Biotechnology progress
ISSN: 1520-6033
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Prog
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506292

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 02 08 2018
revised: 19 09 2018
pubmed: 28 11 2018
medline: 14 3 2020
entrez: 28 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Continuous processes such as perfusion processes can offer advantages compared to fed-batch or batch processes in bio-processing: improved product quality (e.g. for labile products), increased product yield, and cost savings. In this work, a semi-perfusion process was established in shake flasks and transferred to an automated small-scale bioreactor by daily media exchange via centrifugation based on an existing fed-batch process platform. At first the development of a suitable medium and feed composition, the glucose concentration required by the cells and the cell-specific perfusion rate were investigated in shake flasks as the conventional scale-down system. This lead to an optimized process with a threefold higher titer of 10 g/L monoclonal antibody compared to the standard fed-batch. To proof the suitability and benefit as a small-scale model, the established semi-perfusion process was transferred to an automated small-scale bioreactor with improved pH and dissolved oxygen control. The average specific productivity improved from 24.16 pg/(c*d) in the fed-batch process and 36.04 pg/c*d in the semi-perfusion shake flask to 38.88 pg/(c*d) in the semi-perfusion process performed in the controlled small-scale bioreactor, thus illustrating the benefits resulting from the applied semi-perfusion approach, especially in combination with controlled DO and pH settings. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 35: e2757, 2019.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30479066
doi: 10.1002/btpr.2757
pmc: PMC6667907
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2757

Informations de copyright

© 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.

Références

Biotechnol Prog. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(4):776-81
pubmed: 12153312
Biotechnol Prog. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(4):1187-99
pubmed: 20730773
J Pharm Sci. 2015 Mar;104(3):813-20
pubmed: 25417595
Biotechnol J. 2015 Jan;10(1):162-70
pubmed: 25377169
Biotechnol Prog. 1996 Jan-Feb;12(1):100-9
pubmed: 8845100
N Biotechnol. 2013 Jan 25;30(2):238-45
pubmed: 22683938
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Nov;101(22):8101-8113
pubmed: 28951949
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003 Jun 30;82(7):751-65
pubmed: 12701141
Biotechnol Prog. 2008 Jul-Aug;24(4):921-31
pubmed: 19194901
Biotechnol Prog. 2010 Sep-Oct;26(5):1400-10
pubmed: 20945494
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Jan;109(1):137-45
pubmed: 21965160
J Biotechnol. 2015 Oct 20;212:21-9
pubmed: 26197419
Cytotechnology. 2003 May;42(1):35-45
pubmed: 19002926
Cytotechnology. 1996 Jan;22(1-3):3-16
pubmed: 22358910
J Biotechnol. 2016 Aug 10;231:149-159
pubmed: 27320019
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Sep 18;43(16):e102
pubmed: 25977298
Cytotechnology. 2012 Dec;64(6):667-78
pubmed: 22451076
Biotechnol Prog. 1997 Sep-Oct;13(5):688-91
pubmed: 9336989
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002 Jun 30;78(7):741-52
pubmed: 12001166
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Apr;100(8):3451-61
pubmed: 26936774
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Jun;99(11):4645-57
pubmed: 25846330
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015 Oct;112(10):2172-84
pubmed: 25899530
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997 Feb 20;53(4):372-8
pubmed: 18634025
BMC Proc. 2011 Nov 22;5 Suppl 8:P105
pubmed: 22373105
Biotechnol Adv. 2018 Jul - Aug;36(4):1328-1340
pubmed: 29738813
Biotechnol Prog. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):134-9
pubmed: 15903250
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013 Jan;110(1):206-19
pubmed: 22806692
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017 Jul;114(7):1438-1447
pubmed: 28128436
Cytotechnology. 1998 Nov;28(1-3):163-75
pubmed: 19003418
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013 Jun;110(6):1735-47
pubmed: 23296898
J Biotechnol. 2016 Jan 10;217:1-11
pubmed: 26521697
J Biotechnol. 2012 Oct 31;161(3):387-90
pubmed: 22771559
Cytotechnology. 2007 Jul;54(3):189-200
pubmed: 19003011
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013 Dec;110(12):3126-38
pubmed: 23775295

Auteurs

Sabrina Janoschek (S)

R&D BioProcessing, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.

Markus Schulze (M)

R&D BioProcessing, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.

Gerben Zijlstra (G)

Mab Segment Marketing, Sartorius Stedim Netherlands BV, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Gerhard Greller (G)

R&D BioProcessing, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.

Jens Matuszczyk (J)

R&D BioProcessing, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH