Dual actions of the antioxidant chlorophyllin, a glutathione transferase P1-1 inhibitor, in tumorigenesis and tumor progression.

GST P1-1 inhibitor adjuvant therapy breast cancer chlorophyllin

Journal

Journal of cellular biochemistry
ISSN: 1097-4644
Titre abrégé: J Cell Biochem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8205768

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 10 10 2017
accepted: 04 10 2018
pubmed: 30 11 2018
medline: 30 11 2018
entrez: 29 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Glutathione (GSH) and enzymes related to this antioxidant molecule are often overexpressed in tumor cells and may contribute to drug resistance. Blockade of glutathione transferases (GSTs) has been proposed to potentiate the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs in cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of chlorophyllin that has antioxidant properties, and also interferes with the activity of GST P1-1, on breast cancers in vitro and in vivo. The in vivo studies were conducted using an N-methyl- N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced chemical carcinogenesis model in laboratory rats. DNA damage, GST activity, and GSH levels were determined in liver and tumor tissues. Treatment with chlorophyllin increased the GSH levels in the liver and significantly decreased DNA damage in the blood, liver, and tumor tissues. Even though tumorigenesis was delayed in rats receiving chlorophyllin before MNU injections, once the tumors emerged, the progression of tumor appeared to be faster than in the animals that received the carcinogen only. Out of nine breast cell lines, GST P1-1 expression was detected in MCF-12A, MDA-MB-231, and HCC38. Concomitant incubation with chlorophyllin and docetaxel did not significantly affect cell proliferation and viability. Chlorophyllin displayed genoprotective effects that initially delayed tumorigenesis. However, once the tumors were established, it may act as a promoter that facilitates tumor growth, potentially by a mechanism independent of cell proliferation and viability. Our results underline the pros and cons of antioxidant treatment in cancer, even if it has a capacity to inhibit GST P1-1.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30484884
doi: 10.1002/jcb.27974
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7045-7055

Subventions

Organisme : Teaching Staff Training Program
Organisme : Hacettepe University Scientific Research Unit
ID : 012 D09 101 001-20
Organisme : TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) grant
ID : 109S362

Informations de copyright

© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Auteurs

Mehmet Ozcan (M)

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Gunes Esendagli (G)

Department of Basic Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.

Yaman Musdal (Y)

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Hande Canpinar (H)

Department of Basic Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.

Merve Bacanlı (M)

Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey.

Hatice Gul Anlar (HG)

Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey.

Güldal Esendağlı-Yılmaz (G)

Department of Pathology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Mojtaba Beyramzadeh (M)

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Yasemin Aksoy (Y)

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH