Danger of false negative (exclusion) or false positive (diagnosis) for 'congenital thrombophilia' in the age of anticoagulants.
Activated Protein C Resistance
/ diagnosis
Administration, Oral
Anticoagulants
/ analysis
Antithrombins
/ chemistry
Blood Coagulation Tests
/ methods
Factor V
/ chemistry
False Negative Reactions
False Positive Reactions
Humans
Protein C
/ chemistry
Protein S
/ chemistry
Thrombophilia
/ diagnosis
Warfarin
/ therapeutic use
activated protein C resistance
anticoagulant therapy
antithrombin
direct oral anticoagulants
laboratory practice
protein C
protein S
thrombophilia
Journal
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
ISSN: 1437-4331
Titre abrégé: Clin Chem Lab Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9806306
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2019
27 05 2019
Historique:
received:
21
09
2018
accepted:
05
11
2018
pubmed:
30
11
2018
medline:
17
1
2020
entrez:
29
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Most guidelines and experts recommend against performance of thrombophilia testing in general, and specifically against testing patients on pharmacological anticoagulants, due to substantially increased risk of false positive identification. For example, vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy affects protein C (PC) and protein S (PS), as well as some clotting assays (e.g. as used to investigate activated PC resistance [APCR]). Although heparin may also affect clotting assays, most commercial methods contain neutralisers to make them 'insensitive' to therapeutic levels. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) also affect a wide variety of thrombophilia assays, although most reported data has employed artificial in vitro spiked samples. Methods In the current report, data from our facility for the past 2.5 years has been assessed for all 'congenital thrombophilia' related tests, as evaluated against patient anticoagulant status. We processed 10,571 'thrombophilia' related test requests, including antithrombin (AT; n=3470), PC (n=3569), PS (n=3585), APCR (n=2359), factor V Leiden (FVL; n=2659), and prothrombin gene mutation (PGM; n=2103). Results As expected, VKA therapy affected PC and PS, and despite manufacturer claims, also APCR. Most assays, as suggested by manufacturers, were largely resistant to heparin therapy. DOACs' use was associated with falsely low APCR ratios (i.e. FVL-like effect) and somewhat unexpectedly, anti-Xa agents apixaban and rivaroxaban were also associated with lower AT and higher PS values. Conclusions It is concluded that ex-vivo data appears to confirm the potential for both false positive and false negative 'thrombophilia' events in patients on anticoagulant (including DOAC) treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30485173
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1041
pii: cclm-2018-1041
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Antithrombins
0
Protein C
0
Protein S
0
factor V Leiden
0
Warfarin
5Q7ZVV76EI
Factor V
9001-24-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
873-882Références
Favaloro EJ, Pasalic L, Lippi G. Replacing warfarin therapy with the newer direct oral anticoagulants, or simply a growth in anticoagulation therapy? Implications for pathology testing. Pathology 2017;49:639–43.
Favaloro EJ, Pasalic L, Curnow J, Lippi G. Laboratory monitoring or measurement of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): advantages, limitations and future challenges. Curr Drug Metab 2017;18:598–608.
Lippi G, Franchini M, Favaloro EJ. Pharmacogenetics of vitamin K antagonists: useful or hype? Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:503–15.
Bonar R, Favaloro EJ. Explaining and reducing the variation in inter-laboratory reported values for international normalised ratio. Thromb Res 2016;150:22–9.
Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Thomas L, Ansell J, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, et al. Off-label dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and adverse outcomes: The ORBIT-AF II registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2597–604.
Baglin T, Gray E, Greaves M, Hunt BJ, Keeling D, Machin S, et al. Clinical guidelines for testing for heritable thrombophilia. Br J Haematol 2010;149:209–20.
Graham N, Rashiq H, Hunt BJ. Testing for thrombophilia: clinical update. Br J Gen Pract 2014;64:e120–2.
Howard LS, Hughes RJ. NICE guideline: management of venous thromboembolic diseases and role of thrombophilia testing. Thorax 2013;68:391–3.
De Stefano V, Rossi E. Testing for inherited thrombophilia and consequences for antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with venous thromboembolism and their relatives. A review of the guidelines from scientific societies and working groups. Thromb Haemost 2013;110:697–705.
Carroll BJ, Piazza G. Hypercoagulable states in arterial and venous thrombosis: When, how, and who to test? Vasc Med 2018;23:388–99.
Ormesher L, Simcox LE, Tower C, Greer IA. ‘To test or not to test’, the arguments for and against thrombophilia testing in obstetrics. Obstet Med 2017;10:61–6.
Gosselin RC, Adcock DM, Bates SM, Douxfils J, Favaloro EJ, Gouin-Thibault I, et al. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations for laboratory measurement of direct oral anticoagulants. Thromb Haemost 2018;118:437–50.
Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S, Pasalic L, Sioufi J, Marsden K. The effect of dabigatran on haemostasis tests: a comprehensive assessment using in-vitro and ex-vivo samples. Pathology 2015;47:355–64.
Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S, Ahuja M, Pasalic L, Sioufi J, et al. The effect of the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban on haemostasis tests: a comprehensive assessment using in vitro and ex vivo samples. Pathology 2016;48:60–71.
Favaloro EJ, Orsag I, Bukuya M, McDonald D. A nine-year retrospective assessment of laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: evolution of a novel approach to thrombophilia investigations. Pathology 2002;34:348–55.
Mohammed S, Favaloro EJ. Laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance (APCR). Methods Mol Biol 2017;1646:137–43.
Favaloro EJ. Diagnostic issues in Thrombophilia: a laboratory scientist’s view. Semin Thromb Hemost 2005;31:11–6.
Favaloro EJ, McDonald D. Futility of testing for factor V Leiden. Blood Trans 2012;10:260–3.
Pengo V, Tripodi A, Reber G, Rand JH, Ortel TL, Galli M, et al. Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection. J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:1737–40.
Exner T, Michalopoulos N, Pearce J, Xavier R, Ahuja M. Simple method for removing DOACs from plasma samples. Thromb Res 2018;163:117–22.
Mou E, Kwang H, Hom J, Shieh L, Kumar A, Richman I, et al. Magnitude of potentially inappropriate thrombophilia testing in the inpatient hospital setting. J Hosp Med 2017;12:735–8.
Cox N, Johnson SA, Vazquez S, Fleming RP, Rondina MT, Kaplan D, et al. Patterns and appropriateness of thrombophilia testing in an academic medical center. J Hosp Med 2017;12:705–9.
Shen YM, Tsai J, Taiwo E, Gavva C, Yates SG, Patel V, et al. Analysis of thrombophilia test ordering practices at an academic center: a proposal for appropriate testing to reduce harm and cost. PLoS One 2016;11:e0155326.
Kwon AJ, Roshal M, DeSancho MT. Clinical adherence to thrombophilia screening guidelines at a major tertiary care hospital. J Thromb Haemost 2016;14:982–6.
Lippi G. Thrombophilia testing. Useful or hype? Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:467–9.
Franchini M. The utility of thrombophilia testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:495–7.
Favaloro EJ. The futility of thrombophilia testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:499–503.