Designing and evaluating functional laboratory information system requirements integrated to hospital information systems.
Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Laboratory Information Systems
/ organization & administration
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delphi Technique
Hospital Information Systems
/ organization & administration
Humans
Iran
Organizational Innovation
Patient Care Management
/ methods
Quality Improvement
Systems Integration
clinical laboratory information systems
functional requirements
hospital information systems
information technology
Journal
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
ISSN: 1365-2753
Titre abrégé: J Eval Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609066
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
06
09
2018
revised:
26
10
2018
accepted:
26
10
2018
pubmed:
30
11
2018
medline:
26
6
2020
entrez:
29
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Laboratory information sub-systems play an important role in diagnosis and treatment of patients. This study aimed to determine functional requirements of users and assess the existence of these requirements in the laboratory information system. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 2016 in two phases. The first phase was done through three stages. First, based on an unsystematic review of related literature, an outline of functional laboratory information system requirements was identified. In the second stage, these requirements were identified in group meetings in the form of a semi-structured questionnaire and given to experts. Then, modified Delphi technique was used to reach agreement on each item. Then, based on experts' comments, the final version of the questionnaire was presented including 61 closed-ended items using Likert scale and an open-ended item. It was surveyed by 50 experts using Delphi technique. Responses were scored, and the requirements whose mean final score was 3 and above were finally confirmed. In the second phase, based on the confirmed requirements, a checklist comprising 68 requirements was prepared and adopted hospital information systems were evaluated through researcher observation. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The final list of functional laboratory information system requirements was prepared with 68 items. The results of the evaluation revealed that confirmed requirements existed in 58.8% of hospital information systems. Laboratory information system requirements were designed with 68 items. Evaluation results showed that the systems were moderate in terms of compliance with the requirements.
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
788-799Subventions
Organisme : Kashan University of Medical Sciences
ID : 9056
Organisme : Kashan University Medical Research Council
ID : 9056
Informations de copyright
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Références
Nematollahi M, Kharmandar H, Ameripoor MR. Evaluating the performance of the laboratory information system of public hospitals in Shiraz, 2011. Mag Elearning Distribution Acad. 2012;3:3-4.
Radisic-Biljak V, Ozvald I, Radeljak A, et al. Validation of a laboratory and hospital information system in a medical laboratory accredited according to ISO 15189. Biochem Med. 2012;22:86-91.
Asadi F, Moghaddasi H, Mastaneh Z. Situation analysis of hematology information systems in educational-therapeutic hospital laboratories of Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Health Inf Manag. 2009;6:21.
Croxatto A, Prod'hom G, Faverjon F, Rochais Y, Greub G. Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(3):217-235.
Lippi G, Simundic A-M, Mattiuzzi C. Overview on patient safety in healthcare and laboratory diagnostics. Biochem Med. 2010;20:131-142.
Blaya J, Shin S, Yale G, et al. Electronic laboratory system reduces errors in National Tuberculosis Program: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14(8):1009-1015.
Nabovati E, Vakili-Arki H, Eslami S, Khajouei R. Usability evaluation of laboratory and radiology information systems integrated into a hospital information system. J Med Syst. 2014;38(4):35.
Farzandipour M, Ahmadi M, Sadoughi F. Adopting confidentiality principles for electronic health records in Iran: a Delphi study. J Med Syst. 2011;35(3):333-343.
Abera WS. Data exchange interoperability framework for laboratory information system (LIS) and electronic health record (EHR) of two hospitals in Addis Ababa [master thesis]. Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies School of Information Science and School of Public Health, JUNE, 2013.
Khajouei R, Saghaeyannejad Isfahani S, Jahanbakhsh M, Mirmohammadi M. Assessment of the performance of the laboratory information system (LIS) based on the Standards of the American National Standards Institute (ANSH). J Health Biomed Inform. 2015;2:8-16.
Malliarou M, Zyga S. Advantages of information systems in health services. Choregia. 2009;5:43-54.
Khajouei R, Jaspers MW. The impact of CPOE medication systems' design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49:3.
Gursel G, Yazar B, Kuru HGK. Determining the weak sides of healthcare information systems: an empirical E-health evaluation study. AJIT-E: Online Acad J Inform Technol. 2016;7(23):17-29.
Ammenwerth E, Ehlers F, Hirsch B, Gratl G. HIS-monitor: an approach to assess the quality of information processing in hospitals. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(2-3):216-225.
Jeddi FR, Farzandipoor M, Arabfard M, Hosseini. Conceptual model of clinical governance information system for statistical indicators by using UML in two sample hospitals. Acta Inform Med. 2016;24(2):120-123.
Farzandipur M, Rangraz Jeddi F, Azimi E. Factors affecting successful implementation of hospital information systems. Acta Inform Med. 2016;24(1):51-55.
Kaplan B, Harris-Salamone KD. Health IT success and failure: recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(3):291-299.
Lin WT, Shao BB. The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach. Inf Manage. 2000;37(6):283-295.
Farzandipour M, Meidani Z, Riazi H, Sadeqi Jabali M. Nursing information systems requirements: a milestone for patient outcome and patient safety improvement. Comput Inform Nurs. 2016;34(12):601-612.
Blaya JA, Shin SS, Yagui MJ, et al. A web-based laboratory information system to improve quality of care of tuberculosis patients in Peru: functional requirements, implementation and usage statistics. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7(1):33.
Paszko C, Pugsley C. Considerations in selecting a laboratory information management system (LIMS). Am Lab. 2000;32:38-43.
Blignaut P, McDonald T, Tolmie C. System requirements for a computerised patient record information system at a busy primary health care clinic. Curationis. 2001;24(2):68-76.
Farzandipour M, Meidani Z, Riazi H, et al. Functional requirements of pharmacy's information system in hospitals. Iran J Med Infor. 2017;6:1-13.
Ahmadi M, Habibi Koolaee M. Nursing information systems in Iran. Hakim Health Sys Res J. 2010;13:185-191.
Farzandipour M, Meidani Z, Gilasi H, et al. Evaluation of key capabilities for hospital information system: a milestone for meaningful use of information technology. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2017;10:1579.
Kazemi A, Rabiei R, Moghaddasi H, Deimazar G. Pharmacy information systems in teaching hospitals: a multi-dimensional evaluation study. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22(3):231-237.
Raeisi AR, Ehteshami A, Kasai M, et al. Utilization assessment of radiology information system: solution to patient safety improvement. Int J Health Syst Disaster Manage. 2014;2:15.
Keeney S, McKenna H, Hasson F. The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. United Kingdom: Wiley; 2010.
Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Aldrich JE, Tietz NW. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. University of Michigan: W.B. Saunders; 1996.
Meraji M, Ramezan Ghorbani N, Yasaghi S, et al. Assessing features of laboratory information system in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 2014. J Paramed Sci Rehabil. 2016;5:24-33.
Bishop ML, Fody EP, Schoeff LE. Clinical chemistry: principles, techniques, and correlations. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
Kuperman GJ, Bobb A, Payne TH, et al. Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):29-40.
Niès J, Colombet I, Zapletal E, Gillaizeau F, Chevalier P, Durieux P. Effects of automated alerts on unnecessarily repeated serology tests in a cardiovascular surgery department: a time series analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):70.
Singh H, Thomas EJ, Sittig DF, et al. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010;123(3):238-244.
Jebraeily M, Raheimi B, Zareh Z, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of hospital information systems in teaching hospitals of Urmia University of Medical Sciences. J Nurs Midwifery Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2012;10:326-331.
Hebda T, Czar P, Mascara C. Handbook of Informatics for Nurses and Health Care Professionals. University of Michigan: Prentice Hall; 2005.
Sepulveda JL, Young DS. The ideal laboratory information system. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137(8):1129-1140.
Genc O, Aksu E. Inappropriate use of serological tests for hepatitis B virus in Evliya Celebi Education and Research Hospital of Dumlupinar University, Kutahya. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2014;48(4):618-627.
Ozcan O, Cakırca G, Yonden Z. Delays in reporting critical values from clinical laboratories to responsible healthcare staff. Turk J Biochem. 2017;42:45-50.
Quinn T, Rudolph JW, Fairchild DG. Lab turnaround time and delayed discharges: a systems-based action research investigation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International System Dynamics Conference 2005.
Epner PL, Gans JE, Graber ML. When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 2):ii6-ii10.
Wipfli R, Lovis C. Alerts in clinical information systems: building frameworks and prototypes. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;155:163-169.
Adelman JS, Kalkut GE, Schechter CB, et al. Understanding and preventing wrong-patient electronic orders: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;20:305-310.