A Status-Seeking Account of Psychological Entitlement.
benign and malicious envy
entitlement
hierarchy
social status
Journal
Personality & social psychology bulletin
ISSN: 1552-7433
Titre abrégé: Pers Soc Psychol Bull
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7809042
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
11
2018
medline:
3
6
2020
entrez:
30
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We propose that people high in entitlement are characterized by motivation to attain status. Five studies (total N = 2,372) support that entitlement promotes motivation to seek status. This motivation, in turn, relates to affective processes when facing upward comparisons and contributes to status attainment. Specifically, entitlement fostered prestige and dominance motivation. These, in turn, predicted greater benign and malicious envy, respectively, when encountering high-status others. The indirect effects occurred when entitlement was measured (Studies 1A and 1B) and manipulated (Studies 2A and 2B). Finally, entitlement related to status attainment, yet not always in line with more entitled people's motivation. Although they ascribed themselves both more prestige and dominance, others ascribed them only more dominance, yet less prestige (Studies 3A, 3B, and 3C). These findings suggest that a status-seeking account offers important insights into the complexities of entitled behavior and its social consequences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30486751
doi: 10.1177/0146167218808501
pmc: PMC6552293
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1113-1128Références
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jun;37(6):784-95
pubmed: 21383070
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
pubmed: 18697684
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Mar;116(3):444-466
pubmed: 29608073
Psychol Bull. 2016 Nov;142(11):1204-1226
pubmed: 27504935
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 May;5(3):292-314
pubmed: 21874133
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Feb;36(2):200-12
pubmed: 20032268
Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):586-92
pubmed: 11129362
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2223-32
pubmed: 21147798
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):764-71
pubmed: 22653798
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 May;54(5):890-902
pubmed: 3379585
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):574-601
pubmed: 25774679
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Feb;98(2):245-55
pubmed: 20085398
Evol Hum Behav. 2001 May;22(3):165-196
pubmed: 11384884
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;114(4):572-598
pubmed: 29376662
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb 1;45(2):448
pubmed: 20126295
Assessment. 2017 Jun;24(4):419-443
pubmed: 26874362
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):233-9
pubmed: 17444920
Evol Hum Behav. 2008 Nov;29(6):402-415
pubmed: 19884954
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;22(1):3-31
pubmed: 28132598
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):453-72
pubmed: 26167795
Pers Individ Dif. 2012 Jun 1;52(8):942-946
pubmed: 22773880
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):554-9
pubmed: 19653779
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Jul;41(7):901-17
pubmed: 25888681
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Mar;80(3):439-48
pubmed: 11300577
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jun;42(6):723-37
pubmed: 27036500
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(3):390-406
pubmed: 22471848
Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):419-29
pubmed: 19485619
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan;104(1):103-25
pubmed: 23163747
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):284-94
pubmed: 25534243
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1123-37
pubmed: 17144769
J Pers Assess. 2004 Aug;83(1):29-45
pubmed: 15271594
Emotion. 2019 Apr;19(3):489-502
pubmed: 29771546