A Comparative Effectiveness Trial to Reduce Burnout and Improve Quality of Care.
Adult
Burnout, Professional
/ diagnosis
Community Mental Health Centers
/ organization & administration
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Female
Health Education
/ organization & administration
Health Personnel
/ education
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Health
Patient-Centered Care
/ organization & administration
Quality of Health Care
/ organization & administration
Burnout
Mental health
Quality of care
Randomized comparative effectiveness
Journal
Administration and policy in mental health
ISSN: 1573-3289
Titre abrégé: Adm Policy Ment Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8914574
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
11
2018
medline:
31
3
2020
entrez:
30
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinician burnout is presumed to negatively impact healthcare quality; yet scant research has rigorously addressed this hypothesis. Using a mixed-methods, randomized, comparative effectiveness design, we tested two competing approaches to improve care-one addressing clinician burnout and the other addressing how clinicians interact with consumers-with 192 clinicians and 469 consumers at two community mental health centers. Although qualitative reports were promising, we found no comparative effectiveness for either intervention on burnout, patient-centered processes, or other outcomes. Discussion includes identifying ways to strengthen approaches to clinician burnout.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30488144
doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0908-4
pii: 10.1007/s10488-018-0908-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
238-254Subventions
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : IH-1304-6597
Pays : United States