Do dGEMRIC and T2 Imaging Correlate With Histologic Cartilage Degeneration in an Experimental Ovine FAI Model?
Journal
Clinical orthopaedics and related research
ISSN: 1528-1132
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0075674
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
7
12
2018
medline:
19
2
2020
entrez:
4
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Biochemical MRI of hip cartilage such as delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping is increasingly used to judge cartilage quality in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The current evidence is sparse about which of these techniques yields a stronger correlation with histologic cartilage degeneration because of the difficulty in validating biochemical MRI techniques against histology in the clinical setting. Recently, an experimental ovine FAI model was established that induces chondrolabral damage and offers a validated platform to address these limitations. In a sheep model, we asked: (1) Do dGEMRIC and/or T2 values of acetabular and femoral cartilage correlate with histologic cartilage degeneration as assessed with the Mankin score? (2) Do simultaneously measured dGEMRIC and T2 values correlate in an experimental ovine FAI model? We performed an experimental pilot study on five female Swiss Alpine sheep (10 hips) that underwent postmortem MRI, including biochemical cartilage sequences, after a staged FAI correction had been performed on one side. No surgery was performed on the contralateral side, which served as a healthy control. In these sheep, an extraarticular intertrochanteric varus osteotomy was performed to rotate the naturally aspherical ovine femoral head into the acetabulum to induce cam-type FAI and chondrolabral damage comparable to human beings. After a 70-day ambulation period, femoral osteochondroplasty was performed and all sheep were euthanized after a total observation period of 210 days. Before they were euthanized, the sheep received a contrast agent and roamed and walked for at least 45 minutes. Hips were prepared to fit in a knee coil and MRI was performed at 3 T including a three-dimensional (3-D) dGEMRIC sequence, a two-dimensional (2-D) radial T2 mapping sequence, and a 2-D radial proton density-weighted sequence for morphologic cartilage assessment. Using specifically developed software, the 3-D dGEMRIC images and T2 maps were coregistered on the 2-D morphologic radial images. This enabled us to simultaneously measure dGEMRIC and T2 values using the identical regions of interest. dGEMRIC and T2 values of the acetabular and femoral cartilage were measured circumferentially using anatomic landmarks. After MRI, bone-cartilage samples were taken from the acetabulum and the femur and stained with toluidine blue for assessment of the histologic cartilage degeneration using the Mankin score, which was assessed in consensus by two observers. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to (1) correlate dGEMRIC values and T2 values with the histologic Mankin score of femoroacetabular cartilage; and to (2) correlate dGEMRIC values and T2 values of femoroacetabular cartilage. A moderate to fair correlation between overall dGEMRIC values of the acetabular cartilage (R = -0.430; p = 0.003) and the femoral cartilage (R = -0.334; p = 0.003) versus the histologic Mankin score was found. A moderate correlation (R = -0.515; p = 0.010) was found among peripheral dGEMRIC values of the acetabulum, the superior femoral cartilage (R = -0.500; p = 0.034), and the histologic Mankin score, respectively. No correlation between overall and regional femoroacetabular T2 values and the histologic Mankin scores was found. No correlation between overall and regional femoroacetabular dGEMRIC values and T2 values was found. In this recently established sheep model, we found dGEMRIC values correlated well with histologic evidence of cartilage degeneration in the hip. This combination of a robust animal model and an accurate imaging technique appears to offer a noninvasive means to study the natural course of FAI and to compare the effectiveness of potential surgical options to treat it. This translational study supports the continuing use of dGEMRIC as a biomarker for prearthritic cartilage degeneration with the ultimate goal to identify patients who will benefit most from corrective FAI surgery. The value of T2 imaging of hip cartilage warrants further investigation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Biochemical MRI of hip cartilage such as delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping is increasingly used to judge cartilage quality in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The current evidence is sparse about which of these techniques yields a stronger correlation with histologic cartilage degeneration because of the difficulty in validating biochemical MRI techniques against histology in the clinical setting. Recently, an experimental ovine FAI model was established that induces chondrolabral damage and offers a validated platform to address these limitations.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES
In a sheep model, we asked: (1) Do dGEMRIC and/or T2 values of acetabular and femoral cartilage correlate with histologic cartilage degeneration as assessed with the Mankin score? (2) Do simultaneously measured dGEMRIC and T2 values correlate in an experimental ovine FAI model?
METHODS
We performed an experimental pilot study on five female Swiss Alpine sheep (10 hips) that underwent postmortem MRI, including biochemical cartilage sequences, after a staged FAI correction had been performed on one side. No surgery was performed on the contralateral side, which served as a healthy control. In these sheep, an extraarticular intertrochanteric varus osteotomy was performed to rotate the naturally aspherical ovine femoral head into the acetabulum to induce cam-type FAI and chondrolabral damage comparable to human beings. After a 70-day ambulation period, femoral osteochondroplasty was performed and all sheep were euthanized after a total observation period of 210 days. Before they were euthanized, the sheep received a contrast agent and roamed and walked for at least 45 minutes. Hips were prepared to fit in a knee coil and MRI was performed at 3 T including a three-dimensional (3-D) dGEMRIC sequence, a two-dimensional (2-D) radial T2 mapping sequence, and a 2-D radial proton density-weighted sequence for morphologic cartilage assessment. Using specifically developed software, the 3-D dGEMRIC images and T2 maps were coregistered on the 2-D morphologic radial images. This enabled us to simultaneously measure dGEMRIC and T2 values using the identical regions of interest. dGEMRIC and T2 values of the acetabular and femoral cartilage were measured circumferentially using anatomic landmarks. After MRI, bone-cartilage samples were taken from the acetabulum and the femur and stained with toluidine blue for assessment of the histologic cartilage degeneration using the Mankin score, which was assessed in consensus by two observers. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to (1) correlate dGEMRIC values and T2 values with the histologic Mankin score of femoroacetabular cartilage; and to (2) correlate dGEMRIC values and T2 values of femoroacetabular cartilage.
RESULTS
A moderate to fair correlation between overall dGEMRIC values of the acetabular cartilage (R = -0.430; p = 0.003) and the femoral cartilage (R = -0.334; p = 0.003) versus the histologic Mankin score was found. A moderate correlation (R = -0.515; p = 0.010) was found among peripheral dGEMRIC values of the acetabulum, the superior femoral cartilage (R = -0.500; p = 0.034), and the histologic Mankin score, respectively. No correlation between overall and regional femoroacetabular T2 values and the histologic Mankin scores was found. No correlation between overall and regional femoroacetabular dGEMRIC values and T2 values was found.
CONCLUSIONS
In this recently established sheep model, we found dGEMRIC values correlated well with histologic evidence of cartilage degeneration in the hip. This combination of a robust animal model and an accurate imaging technique appears to offer a noninvasive means to study the natural course of FAI and to compare the effectiveness of potential surgical options to treat it.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This translational study supports the continuing use of dGEMRIC as a biomarker for prearthritic cartilage degeneration with the ultimate goal to identify patients who will benefit most from corrective FAI surgery. The value of T2 imaging of hip cartilage warrants further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30507833
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000593
pmc: PMC6494333
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
990-1003Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Cartilage. 2018 Apr;9(2):118-126
pubmed: 29126367
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Mar;44(3):339-43
pubmed: 25307050
N Engl J Med. 1974 Dec 19;291(25):1335-40
pubmed: 4610394
BMC Health Serv Res. 2002 Mar 26;2(1):8
pubmed: 11914164
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Oct;43(10):1429-45
pubmed: 24643762
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1169-1177
pubmed: 27718121
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):772-82
pubmed: 25742194
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3332-41
pubmed: 22907475
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Aug 19;97(16):1305-15
pubmed: 26290081
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Apr;45(4):949-965
pubmed: 28019053
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Mar;19(3):324-31
pubmed: 21172446
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):e81-6
pubmed: 23122675
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1080-1099
pubmed: 27709422
Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug;31(8):1497-506
pubmed: 25896275
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Jul;20(7):653-60
pubmed: 22469845
J Orthop Res. 2013 Apr;31(4):580-7
pubmed: 23447499
Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1202-1212
pubmed: 29373295
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Aug;44(8):1073-83
pubmed: 25913097
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2168-80
pubmed: 27278677
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2633-2640
pubmed: 27535284
Arthroscopy. 2016 Aug;32(8):1601-11
pubmed: 27132779
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jul;42(1):105-13
pubmed: 25244647
Cartilage. 2014 Jul;5(3):154-64
pubmed: 26069695
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Dec;44(6):1539-1545
pubmed: 27192497
J Orthop Res. 1992 Jan;10(1):58-61
pubmed: 1727936
Radiology. 2017 Mar;282(3):734-742
pubmed: 27649101
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jun;204(6):W695-700
pubmed: 26001258
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Nov;26(9):1215-20
pubmed: 18502073
Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Jun;22(5):673-82
pubmed: 15172061
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Jan;26(1):128-137
pubmed: 29061495
J Orthop Res. 2016 Jun;34(6):1004-9
pubmed: 26573964
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2017 Nov;21(5):487-506
pubmed: 29025180
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1333-41
pubmed: 25367110
J Orthop Res. 2018 Sep;36(9):2340-2348
pubmed: 29575173
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1058-1065
pubmed: 27807678
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct;85(10):1987-92
pubmed: 14563809
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jul;88(7):1540-8
pubmed: 16818980
Cartilage. 2014 Jan;5(1):11-5
pubmed: 26069681
N Engl J Med. 1974 Dec 12;291(24):1285-92
pubmed: 4610388
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1318-24
pubmed: 25183216
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Sep;23(9):2484-93
pubmed: 24714975