One Year of Romosozumab Followed by Two Years of Denosumab Maintains Fracture Risk Reductions: Results of the FRAME Extension Study.
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ adverse effects
Biomarkers
/ metabolism
Bone Density
/ drug effects
Bone Remodeling
/ drug effects
Denosumab
/ adverse effects
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Therapy, Combination
Fracture Fixation
Fractures, Bone
/ drug therapy
Humans
Incidence
Risk Reduction Behavior
BONE MINERAL DENSITY
DENOSUMAB
FRACTURE RISK
POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS
ROMOSOZUMAB
Journal
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
ISSN: 1523-4681
Titre abrégé: J Bone Miner Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610640
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
18
05
2018
revised:
16
10
2018
accepted:
28
10
2018
pubmed:
7
12
2018
medline:
11
7
2020
entrez:
4
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Romosozumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits sclerostin, has the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. As previously reported in the pivotal FRActure study in postmenopausal woMen with ostEoporosis (FRAME), women with a T-score of ≤ -2.5 at the total hip or femoral neck received subcutaneous placebo or romosozumab once monthly for 12 months, followed by open-label subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months for an additional 12 months. Upon completion of the 24-month primary analysis period, eligible women entered the extension phase and received denosumab for an additional 12 months. Here, we report the final analysis results through 36 months, including efficacy assessments of new vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fracture; bone mineral density (BMD); and safety assessments. Of 7180 women enrolled, 5743 (80%) completed the 36-month study (2851 romosozumab-to-denosumab; 2892 placebo-to-denosumab). Through 36 months, fracture risk was reduced in subjects receiving romosozumab versus placebo for 12 months followed by 24 months of denosumab for both groups: new vertebral fracture (relative risk reduction [RRR], 66%; incidence, 1.0% versus 2.8%; p < 0.001), clinical fracture (RRR, 27%; incidence, 4.0% versus 5.5%; p = 0.004), and nonvertebral fracture (RRR, 21%; incidence, 3.9% versus 4.9%; p = 0.039). BMD continued to increase for the 2 years with denosumab treatment in both arms. The substantial difference in BMD achieved through 12 months of romosozumab treatment versus placebo was maintained through the follow-up period when both treatment arms received denosumab. Subject incidence of adverse events, including positively adjudicated serious cardiovascular adverse events, were overall balanced between groups. In conclusion, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 12 months of romosozumab led to persistent fracture reduction benefit and ongoing BMD gains when followed by 24 months of denosumab. The sequence of romosozumab followed by denosumab may be a promising regimen for the treatment of osteoporosis. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Biomarkers
0
romosozumab
3VHF2ZD92J
Denosumab
4EQZ6YO2HI
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01575834']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
419-428Informations de copyright
© 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.