Evaluation of commercial probiotic lactic cultures against biofilm formation by Cronobacter sakazakii.
Antimicrobial
Biofilm
Cronobacter sakazakii
Probiotics
Journal
Intestinal research
ISSN: 1598-9100
Titre abrégé: Intest Res
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101572802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
12
07
2018
accepted:
15
10
2018
pubmed:
7
12
2018
medline:
7
12
2018
entrez:
4
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cronobacter sakazakii, an emergent pathogen is considered as a major concern to infants and neonates fed on reconstituted powdered infant milk formula. In conjunction with many other factors, biofilm forming capacity adds to its pathogenic potential. In view of the facts that infants are at highest risk to C. sakazakii infections, and emerging antibiotic resistance among pathogens, it is imperative to evaluate probiotic cultures for their efficacy against C. sakazakii. Therefore, pure probiotic strains were isolated from commercial probiotic products and tested for their antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities against C. sakazakii. A total of 6 probiotic strains were tested for their antibiotic susceptibility followed by antimicrobial activity using cell-free supernatant (CFS) against C. sakazakii. The inhibitory activity of CFS against biofilm formation by C. sakazakii was determined using standard crystal violet assay and microscopic observations. All the probiotic strains were sensitive to ampicillin, tetracycline, vancomycin and carbenicillin whereas most of the strains were resistant to erythromycin and novobiocin. Four of the 6 probiotic derived CFS possessed antimicrobial activity against C. sakazakii at a level of 40 μL. A higher biofilm inhibitory activity (>80%) was observed at initial stages of biofilm formation with weaker activity during longer incubation upto 48 hours (50%-60%). The study indicated the efficacy of isolated commercial probiotics strains as potential inhibitor of biofilm formation by C. sakazakii and could be further explored for novel bioactive molecules to limit the emerging infections of C. sakazakii.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Cronobacter sakazakii, an emergent pathogen is considered as a major concern to infants and neonates fed on reconstituted powdered infant milk formula. In conjunction with many other factors, biofilm forming capacity adds to its pathogenic potential. In view of the facts that infants are at highest risk to C. sakazakii infections, and emerging antibiotic resistance among pathogens, it is imperative to evaluate probiotic cultures for their efficacy against C. sakazakii. Therefore, pure probiotic strains were isolated from commercial probiotic products and tested for their antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities against C. sakazakii.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 6 probiotic strains were tested for their antibiotic susceptibility followed by antimicrobial activity using cell-free supernatant (CFS) against C. sakazakii. The inhibitory activity of CFS against biofilm formation by C. sakazakii was determined using standard crystal violet assay and microscopic observations.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All the probiotic strains were sensitive to ampicillin, tetracycline, vancomycin and carbenicillin whereas most of the strains were resistant to erythromycin and novobiocin. Four of the 6 probiotic derived CFS possessed antimicrobial activity against C. sakazakii at a level of 40 μL. A higher biofilm inhibitory activity (>80%) was observed at initial stages of biofilm formation with weaker activity during longer incubation upto 48 hours (50%-60%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The study indicated the efficacy of isolated commercial probiotics strains as potential inhibitor of biofilm formation by C. sakazakii and could be further explored for novel bioactive molecules to limit the emerging infections of C. sakazakii.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30508474
pii: ir.2018.00106
doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.00106
pmc: PMC6505092
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
192-201Références
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 Nov;32 Suppl 1:S71-8
pubmed: 18757184
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Dec 31;136(2):204-13
pubmed: 19346021
Virulence. 2017 Apr 3;8(3):275-281
pubmed: 27715454
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Dec 31;136(2):214-20
pubmed: 19720413
EFSA J. 2008 Jul 14;6(7):732
pubmed: 37213835
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Jul 31;125(3):286-92
pubmed: 18524406
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Sep;99(9):7002-7015
pubmed: 27423943
Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2015 Oct;18(10):1001-7
pubmed: 26730335
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009 Feb 6;379(2):324-9
pubmed: 19103165
Food Res Int. 2017 Dec;102:61-67
pubmed: 29195992
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018 Mar;10(1):34-42
pubmed: 28293865
Med Mal Infect. 2017 Nov;47(7):477-483
pubmed: 28797834
Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015 Jan 2;29(1):84-91
pubmed: 26019620
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017 Jan;61(1):
pubmed: 27500859
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2015 Jun;7(2):146-56
pubmed: 25666113
BMC Microbiol. 2014 Aug 14;14:197
pubmed: 25124936
Virulence. 2015;6(5):433-40
pubmed: 25950947
Gut Microbes. 2017 Nov 2;8(6):521-543
pubmed: 28640662
Microb Biotechnol. 2012 Nov;5(6):670-3
pubmed: 22905927
Indian J Microbiol. 2012 Mar;52(1):3-12
pubmed: 23449986
Matern Child Nutr. 2005 Jan;1(1):44-50
pubmed: 16881878
Curr Microbiol. 2017 May;74(5):560-565
pubmed: 28258294
Nature. 2002 Apr 18;416(6882):740-3
pubmed: 11961556
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Aug;285(1):58-64
pubmed: 18503543
J Food Prot. 2009 Feb;72(2):340-6
pubmed: 19350978
J Food Sci. 2013 Sep;78(9):M1416-20
pubmed: 23924352
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):5846-56
pubmed: 16957203
Microbiology (Reading). 2016 Sep;162(9):1708-1714
pubmed: 27460095
J Food Prot. 2005 Nov;68(11):2287-94
pubmed: 16300064
J Dairy Res. 2018 Feb;85(1):98-103
pubmed: 29468996
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Aug;12(8):1185-9
pubmed: 16965695
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Nov;101(22):8851-4
pubmed: 20637606