Predictive factors of patients' general quality of life after nasal septoplasty.
Nasal obstruction
Predictive factors
Quality of life
Septoplasty
Stress
Symptom severity
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
04
10
2018
accepted:
28
11
2018
pubmed:
5
12
2018
medline:
12
4
2019
entrez:
5
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although septoplasty is considered to be the definitive treatment of septal deviation and is associated with an increase of nasal patency, patients are not always satisfied with the surgical outcome as assessed by its effect on their general Quality of Life (QOL).The aim of this study was to identify the predictive factors that influence the patients' QOL after surgery. 60 patients with nasal obstruction and septal deviation were enrolled in this prospective study, and they all completed the follow-up survey of 6 postoperative months. Symptom severity (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation-NOSE, Sino nasal outcome test 22-SNOT-22), sleep quality (Epworth Sleepiness Scale-ESS), olfactory function (Threshold Discrimination Identification-TDI score), voice quality (Nasalance score and Voice Handicap Index-VHI), stress (SQ test) and emotional status (Beck Depression Index-BDI) were evaluated as predictive factors of patients' QOL (Glasgow Benefit Inventory-GBI) postoperatively. We also analyzed age, gender, smoking, socioeconomic status, type of septal deviation and changes of nasal patency (with the use of rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry, and peak nasal inspiratory flow). From all the analyzed parameters, the nasal obstruction symptom severity, the sleep quality, and stress levels were only significantly associated with patients' overall QOL (p < 0.05; univariate analysis). However, on multiple regression, positive changes in NOSE score (OR 15.09, 95% CI 1.47-22.64, p < 0.05) and SQ test (OR 4, 95% CI 1.12-14.3, p < 0.05) were only related with higher likelihood of participants' QOL improvement after surgery. Thorough preoperative evaluation of the symptom severity and stress levels is critical as these two factors are predictive of patient's satisfaction after septoplasty.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30511105
doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5229-4
pii: 10.1007/s00405-018-5229-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
429-438Références
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;127(1):36-42
pubmed: 12161728
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jan-Feb;25(1):45-9
pubmed: 21711978
Med Sci Monit. 2007 Feb;13(2):CR89-99
pubmed: 17261988
J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Nov;121(11):1060-3
pubmed: 17349096
Laryngoscope. 1997 Apr;107(4):472-7
pubmed: 9111376
J Voice. 2005 Mar;19(1):71-7
pubmed: 15766851
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2016 Oct 28;16:13
pubmed: 27799847
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):48-52
pubmed: 23169536
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2016 Oct;41(3):93-100
pubmed: 25842965
Int J Otolaryngol. 2017;2017:4718108
pubmed: 28883833
Rhinology. 2009 Dec;47(4):444-9
pubmed: 19936374
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Feb;122(2):228-32
pubmed: 10652395
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2005;67(2):70-4
pubmed: 15761245
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jan 05;9(1):1
pubmed: 20051118
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2007;59(6):286-96
pubmed: 17965571
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005 Jun;32(2):129-37
pubmed: 15917169
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Dec;34(6):518-25
pubmed: 20070760
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;22(3):284-290
pubmed: 29983770
Eur Respir J. 2007 Dec;30(6):1208-15
pubmed: 18055705
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Jul;5(7):616-21
pubmed: 25930143
Laryngoscope. 2008 Feb;118(2):354-9
pubmed: 18000468
Chem Senses. 2002 Nov;27(9):831-9
pubmed: 12438209
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 Jan;27(1):67-70
pubmed: 23406604
Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Aug;25(8):671-88
pubmed: 21668367
Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 Jul;126(7):752-7
pubmed: 16803716
J Pers Assess. 1996 Dec;67(3):588-97
pubmed: 8991972
Med Sci Monit. 2009 Jun;15(6):CR269-73
pubmed: 19478696
Rhinology. 2016 Dec 1;54(4):355-360
pubmed: 27262342
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001 Oct;26(5):367-70
pubmed: 11678943
Chem Senses. 2004 Jun;29(5):365-79
pubmed: 15201204
Chem Senses. 1997 Feb;22(1):39-52
pubmed: 9056084
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;275(5):1039-1048
pubmed: 29332171
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Apr;36(2):106-13
pubmed: 21332671
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Dec;269(12):2497-503
pubmed: 22274692
Laryngoscope. 2007 Jan;117(1):114-20
pubmed: 17202939
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;271(4):733-41
pubmed: 23842603
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;269(10):2189-95
pubmed: 22231798
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005 Dec;32(4):369-74
pubmed: 16043320
Laryngoscope. 2012 Jul;122(7):1450-4
pubmed: 22566102
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012 Jun;39(3):275-9
pubmed: 21885221
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003 Jan;112(1):91-7
pubmed: 12537065
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Feb;130(2):157-63
pubmed: 14990910
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Mar;130(3):283-90
pubmed: 15054368