Patient Experiences with Chronic Care Management Services and Fees: a Qualitative Study.


Journal

Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 18 01 2018
accepted: 02 11 2018
revised: 10 07 2018
pubmed: 5 12 2018
medline: 20 6 2020
entrez: 5 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As of 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pays for chronic care management (CCM) services for Medicare beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions. CMS requires eligible providers to first obtain patients' verbal (and, prior to 2017, written) consent, to ensure that patients who participate in CCM services understand their rights and agree to any applicable cost sharing. CCM providers must also enhance patients' access to continuous and coordinated care, including ongoing care management. To understand patients' perceptions of the consent process, their reasons for choosing to participate, and their experiences receiving CCM services. Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Medicare beneficiaries who had two or more CCM claims submitted by an eligible provider. Beneficiaries were selected from a sampling frame of Medicare claims submitted between January and September 2015. Most patients reported no concerns about being asked to participate in CCM. The majority of patients had secondary insurance (or Medicaid) that covered any coinsurance for CCM and therefore could not say with certainty whether they would participate if they had to pay for CCM services out-of-pocket. Reasons for participating included having insurance that covered the copay and peace of mind about having access to the CCM team. Patients reported multiple benefits of participating in CCM services, including better access to their primary care team, improved continuity of care, and improved care coordination. Most patients reported no downside to participating in CCM services, although some felt they were relatively healthy and questioned whether they needed CCM services. These findings on patients' experiences participating in CCM services during the first 9 months of the policy's implementation can help providers and policymakers understand their perceived benefits and unintended consequences. Our findings also have implications for providers when approaching patients about CCM services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
As of 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pays for chronic care management (CCM) services for Medicare beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions. CMS requires eligible providers to first obtain patients' verbal (and, prior to 2017, written) consent, to ensure that patients who participate in CCM services understand their rights and agree to any applicable cost sharing. CCM providers must also enhance patients' access to continuous and coordinated care, including ongoing care management.
OBJECTIVE
To understand patients' perceptions of the consent process, their reasons for choosing to participate, and their experiences receiving CCM services.
DESIGN
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Medicare beneficiaries who had two or more CCM claims submitted by an eligible provider. Beneficiaries were selected from a sampling frame of Medicare claims submitted between January and September 2015.
KEY RESULTS
Most patients reported no concerns about being asked to participate in CCM. The majority of patients had secondary insurance (or Medicaid) that covered any coinsurance for CCM and therefore could not say with certainty whether they would participate if they had to pay for CCM services out-of-pocket. Reasons for participating included having insurance that covered the copay and peace of mind about having access to the CCM team. Patients reported multiple benefits of participating in CCM services, including better access to their primary care team, improved continuity of care, and improved care coordination. Most patients reported no downside to participating in CCM services, although some felt they were relatively healthy and questioned whether they needed CCM services.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings on patients' experiences participating in CCM services during the first 9 months of the policy's implementation can help providers and policymakers understand their perceived benefits and unintended consequences. Our findings also have implications for providers when approaching patients about CCM services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30511284
doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4750-x
pii: 10.1007/s11606-018-4750-x
pmc: PMC6374248
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

250-255

Références

J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):11-2
pubmed: 24390880
Am J Manag Care. 2015 May;21(5):355-62
pubmed: 26167702
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Nov 12;12:E197
pubmed: 26564013
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1294-1300
pubmed: 28755097

Auteurs

Claire Wilson (C)

Insight Policy Research, Arlington, VA, USA. cwilson@insightpolicyresearch.com.

Ann S O'Malley (AS)

Mathematica Policy Research, Washington DC, USA.

Carla Bozzolo (C)

Insight Policy Research, Arlington, VA, USA.

Nancy McCall (N)

Mathematica Policy Research, Washington DC, USA.

Sai Ma (S)

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH