Patient Experiences with Chronic Care Management Services and Fees: a Qualitative Study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.
/ economics
Chronic Disease
/ economics
Fee-for-Service Plans
/ economics
Female
Humans
Informed Consent
/ standards
Long-Term Care
/ economics
Male
Medicare
/ economics
Patient Satisfaction
/ economics
Qualitative Research
United States
/ epidemiology
care coordination
care management
chronic conditions
patient experiences
qualitative research
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
18
01
2018
accepted:
02
11
2018
revised:
10
07
2018
pubmed:
5
12
2018
medline:
20
6
2020
entrez:
5
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As of 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pays for chronic care management (CCM) services for Medicare beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions. CMS requires eligible providers to first obtain patients' verbal (and, prior to 2017, written) consent, to ensure that patients who participate in CCM services understand their rights and agree to any applicable cost sharing. CCM providers must also enhance patients' access to continuous and coordinated care, including ongoing care management. To understand patients' perceptions of the consent process, their reasons for choosing to participate, and their experiences receiving CCM services. Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Medicare beneficiaries who had two or more CCM claims submitted by an eligible provider. Beneficiaries were selected from a sampling frame of Medicare claims submitted between January and September 2015. Most patients reported no concerns about being asked to participate in CCM. The majority of patients had secondary insurance (or Medicaid) that covered any coinsurance for CCM and therefore could not say with certainty whether they would participate if they had to pay for CCM services out-of-pocket. Reasons for participating included having insurance that covered the copay and peace of mind about having access to the CCM team. Patients reported multiple benefits of participating in CCM services, including better access to their primary care team, improved continuity of care, and improved care coordination. Most patients reported no downside to participating in CCM services, although some felt they were relatively healthy and questioned whether they needed CCM services. These findings on patients' experiences participating in CCM services during the first 9 months of the policy's implementation can help providers and policymakers understand their perceived benefits and unintended consequences. Our findings also have implications for providers when approaching patients about CCM services.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
As of 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pays for chronic care management (CCM) services for Medicare beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions. CMS requires eligible providers to first obtain patients' verbal (and, prior to 2017, written) consent, to ensure that patients who participate in CCM services understand their rights and agree to any applicable cost sharing. CCM providers must also enhance patients' access to continuous and coordinated care, including ongoing care management.
OBJECTIVE
To understand patients' perceptions of the consent process, their reasons for choosing to participate, and their experiences receiving CCM services.
DESIGN
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Medicare beneficiaries who had two or more CCM claims submitted by an eligible provider. Beneficiaries were selected from a sampling frame of Medicare claims submitted between January and September 2015.
KEY RESULTS
Most patients reported no concerns about being asked to participate in CCM. The majority of patients had secondary insurance (or Medicaid) that covered any coinsurance for CCM and therefore could not say with certainty whether they would participate if they had to pay for CCM services out-of-pocket. Reasons for participating included having insurance that covered the copay and peace of mind about having access to the CCM team. Patients reported multiple benefits of participating in CCM services, including better access to their primary care team, improved continuity of care, and improved care coordination. Most patients reported no downside to participating in CCM services, although some felt they were relatively healthy and questioned whether they needed CCM services.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings on patients' experiences participating in CCM services during the first 9 months of the policy's implementation can help providers and policymakers understand their perceived benefits and unintended consequences. Our findings also have implications for providers when approaching patients about CCM services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30511284
doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4750-x
pii: 10.1007/s11606-018-4750-x
pmc: PMC6374248
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
250-255Références
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):11-2
pubmed: 24390880
Am J Manag Care. 2015 May;21(5):355-62
pubmed: 26167702
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Nov 12;12:E197
pubmed: 26564013
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1294-1300
pubmed: 28755097