Current appeal system for those detained in England and Wales under the Mental Health Act needs reform.
capacity
involuntary civil commitment
law
psychiatry
Journal
Journal of medical ethics
ISSN: 1473-4257
Titre abrégé: J Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513619
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
10
05
2018
revised:
30
10
2018
accepted:
18
11
2018
pubmed:
6
12
2018
medline:
16
5
2020
entrez:
6
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The approach to managing the involuntary detention of people suffering from psychiatric conditions can be divided into those with clinicians at the forefront of decision-making and those who rely heavily on the judiciary. The system in England and Wales takes a clinical approach where doctors have widespread powers to detain and treat patients involuntarily. A protection in this system is the right of the individual to challenge a decision to deprive them of their liberty or treat them against their will. This protection is provided by the First-tier Tribunal; however, the number of successful appeals is low. In this paper, the system of appeal in England and Wales is outlined. This is followed by a discussion of why so few patients successfully appeal their detention with the conclusion that the current system is flawed. A number of recommendations about how the system might be reformed are offered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30514756
pii: medethics-2018-104947
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104947
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
173-177Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: CH is the General and Company Secretary of the IME and a member of the IME BMJ Management Committee for the Journal of Medical Ethics.