False-positive rates in screening for trisomies 18 and 13: a comparison between first-trimester combined screening and a cfDNA-based approach.


Journal

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 20 07 2018
accepted: 17 11 2018
pubmed: 7 12 2018
medline: 8 2 2020
entrez: 7 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine the false-positive rates (FPR) associated with screening for trisomy 18/13 using first-trimester combined screening (FTCS) and an ultrasound plus cfDNA-based approach (US-cfDNA), which includes a detailed ultrasound examination, a cfDNA analysis and a FTCS reflex backup test for cases with uninformative results. This is a sub-analysis of a randomized controlled trial, which was performed between 2015 and 2016. Pregnant women with a normal first-trimester ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation (NT < 3.5 mm, no anomalies) were randomized into two groups: FTCS and US-cfDNA screening. The overall FPR in screening for trisomies 18/13 and 21 was compared with the FPR in screening for trisomy 21 alone. Pregnancies were considered screen positive if the risk for trisomy 21 was 1:100 and for trisomy 18 and 13, 1:20 each. The study population consisted of 688 pregnancies in each study arm. In the FCTS group, median delta NT was 0.0 mm, free beta-hCG and PAPP-A 0.96 and 1.11 MoM. In the US-cfDNA group, median delta NT was 0.0 mm. In 10 pregnancies, the cfDNA analysis was uninformative. In the FTCS and in the US-cfDNA group, the FPR in screening for trisomy 21 was 2.5% and 0%. In both groups, the overall FPR was not increased by adding screening algorithms for trisomies 18 and 13. In conclusion, the addition of screening for trisomies 18 and 13 to screening for trisomy 21 does not significantly change FPR. This is true for both the FTCS and the US-cfDNA-based approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30519751
doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4983-2
pii: 10.1007/s00404-018-4983-2
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cell-Free Nucleic Acids 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

431-437

Auteurs

Karl Oliver Kagan (KO)

Department of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. KOKagan@gmx.de.

Jiri Sonek (J)

Fetal Medicine Foundation USA, Dayton, OH, USA.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.

Andreas Sroka (A)

Department of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Harald Abele (H)

Department of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Philipp Wagner (P)

Department of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Natalia Prodan (N)

Department of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Markus Hoopmann (M)

Department of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH