Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States.


Journal

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
ISSN: 1879-1190
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431305

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 27 09 2018
revised: 17 11 2018
accepted: 26 11 2018
pubmed: 12 12 2018
medline: 24 1 2020
entrez: 12 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There are no studies correlating wounding pattern or probability of death based on firearm type used in civilian public mass shooting (CPMS) events. Previous studies on non-CPMS events found that handguns are more lethal than rifles. We hypothesized that CPMS events associated with a handgun are also more lethal than those associated with a rifle. A retrospective study of autopsy reports from CPMS events was performed; CPMS was defined using the FBI and the Congressional Research Service definition. Site(s) of injury, site(s) of fatal injury, and presence of potentially preventable death (PPD) were determined independently by each author and cross-referenced to firearm type used. Autopsy reports of 232 victims from 23 events were reviewed. Seventy-three victims (31%) were shot by handguns, 105 (45%) by rifles, 22 (9%) by shotguns, and 32 (14%) by multiple firearms. Events using a handgun were associated with a higher percentage killed, and events using a rifle were associated with more people shot, although neither difference reached statistical significance. Victims shot by handguns had the highest percentage of having more than 1 fatal wound (26%); those shot by rifle had the lowest percentage (2%) (p = 0.003). Thirty-eight victims (16%) were judged to have had a PPD. The probability of having a PPD was lowest for events involving a handgun (4%) and highest for events involving a rifle (23%) (p = 0.002). Wounding with a handgun was significantly associated with brain (p = 0.007) and cardiac injury (p = 0.03). Civilian public mass shooting events with a handgun are more lethal than those associated with use of a rifle.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There are no studies correlating wounding pattern or probability of death based on firearm type used in civilian public mass shooting (CPMS) events. Previous studies on non-CPMS events found that handguns are more lethal than rifles. We hypothesized that CPMS events associated with a handgun are also more lethal than those associated with a rifle.
STUDY DESIGN
A retrospective study of autopsy reports from CPMS events was performed; CPMS was defined using the FBI and the Congressional Research Service definition. Site(s) of injury, site(s) of fatal injury, and presence of potentially preventable death (PPD) were determined independently by each author and cross-referenced to firearm type used.
RESULTS
Autopsy reports of 232 victims from 23 events were reviewed. Seventy-three victims (31%) were shot by handguns, 105 (45%) by rifles, 22 (9%) by shotguns, and 32 (14%) by multiple firearms. Events using a handgun were associated with a higher percentage killed, and events using a rifle were associated with more people shot, although neither difference reached statistical significance. Victims shot by handguns had the highest percentage of having more than 1 fatal wound (26%); those shot by rifle had the lowest percentage (2%) (p = 0.003). Thirty-eight victims (16%) were judged to have had a PPD. The probability of having a PPD was lowest for events involving a handgun (4%) and highest for events involving a rifle (23%) (p = 0.002). Wounding with a handgun was significantly associated with brain (p = 0.007) and cardiac injury (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
Civilian public mass shooting events with a handgun are more lethal than those associated with use of a rifle.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30529633
pii: S1072-7515(18)32192-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.11.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

228-234

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Babak Sarani (B)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC. Electronic address: bsarani@mfa.gwu.edu.

Cheralyn Hendrix (C)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Mary Matecki (M)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Jordan Estroff (J)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Richard L Amdur (RL)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Bryce R H Robinson (BRH)

Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Geoff Shapiro (G)

Emergency Medical Services Program, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Stephen Gondek (S)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Roger Mitchell (R)

Department of Pathology, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

E Reed Smith (ER)

Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH