Association of preoperative inflammation-based prognostic score with survival in patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy.
Adenocarcinoma
/ mortality
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ analysis
C-Reactive Protein
/ analysis
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ mortality
Esophageal Neoplasms
/ mortality
Esophagectomy
/ methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Preoperative Period
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Salvage Therapy
/ methods
Severity of Illness Index
Glasgow prognostic score
esophageal carcinoma
salvage esophagectomy
Journal
Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
ISSN: 1442-2050
Titre abrégé: Dis Esophagus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8809160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2019
01 Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
12
12
2018
medline:
26
11
2019
entrez:
12
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Salvage esophagectomy (SALV) is potentially beneficial for patients with residual or relapsed esophageal carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), although preoperatively identifying good candidates for SALV remains difficult. We investigated the prognostic impacts of inflammatory and nutritional status in patients undergoing SALV after dCRT. Forty-seven SALV patients were retrospectively reviewed, of whom 46 (98%) had squamous cell carcinoma and 1 (2%) adenocarcinoma. Possible prognostic factors included patients' demographic data, physical status, blood chemistry profiles, and clinical/pathological tumor features. The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) was derived from preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin values. Thirty (64%), 11 (23%), and 6 (13%) patients were classified into the GPS 0, 1, and 2, respectively, groups. None of the possible prognostic factors showed significant correlations with GPS. Patients with GPS 0 had better outcomes than those with GPS 1 or GPS 2 (Median survivals: 37.8, 15.9, and 5.1 months, respectively, P < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, GPS 1 (HR 5.62, 95% CI 1.94-16.4, P = 0.002), GPS 2 (HR 9.10, 95% CI 2.60-31.8, P < 0.001), R1/2 resection (HR 16.3, 95% CI 3.62-86.7, P < 0.001) and incomplete response to dCRT (HR 3.53, 95% CI 1.12-12.5, P = 0.03) were all independent risk factors for a poor outcome. Preoperative GPS is potentially useful for predicting outcomes in esophageal cancer patients undergoing SALV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30535140
pii: 5060212
doi: 10.1093/dote/doy066
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.