Effects of local authority expenditure on childhood obesity.
Journal
European journal of public health
ISSN: 1464-360X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9204966
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2019
01 08 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
12
12
2018
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
12
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Under the 2013 reforms introduced by the Health and Social Care Act (2012), public health responsibilities in England were transferred from the National Health Service to local authorities (LAs). Ring-fenced grants were introduced to support the new responsibilities. The aim of our study was to test whether the level of expenditure in 2013/14 affected the prevalence of childhood obesity in 2016/17. We used National Child Measurement Programme definitions of childhood obesity and datasets. We used LA revenue returns data to derive three measures of per capita expenditure: childhood obesity (<19); physical activity (<19) and the Children's 5-19 Public Health Programme. We ran separate negative binomial models for two age groups of children (4-5 year olds; 10-11 year olds) and conducted sensitivity analyses. With few exceptions, the level of spend in 2013/14 was not significantly associated with the level of childhood obesity in 2016/17. We identified some positive associations between spend on physical activity and the Children's Public Health Programme at baseline (2013/14) and the level of childhood obesity in children aged 4-5 in 2016/17, but the effect was not evident in children aged 10-11. In both age groups, LA levels of childhood obesity in 2016/17 were significantly and positively associated with obesity levels in 2013/14. As these four cohorts comprise entirely different pupils, this underlines the importance of local drivers of childhood obesity. Higher levels of local expenditure are unlikely to be effective in reducing childhood obesity in the short term.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Under the 2013 reforms introduced by the Health and Social Care Act (2012), public health responsibilities in England were transferred from the National Health Service to local authorities (LAs). Ring-fenced grants were introduced to support the new responsibilities. The aim of our study was to test whether the level of expenditure in 2013/14 affected the prevalence of childhood obesity in 2016/17.
METHODS
We used National Child Measurement Programme definitions of childhood obesity and datasets. We used LA revenue returns data to derive three measures of per capita expenditure: childhood obesity (<19); physical activity (<19) and the Children's 5-19 Public Health Programme. We ran separate negative binomial models for two age groups of children (4-5 year olds; 10-11 year olds) and conducted sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS
With few exceptions, the level of spend in 2013/14 was not significantly associated with the level of childhood obesity in 2016/17. We identified some positive associations between spend on physical activity and the Children's Public Health Programme at baseline (2013/14) and the level of childhood obesity in children aged 4-5 in 2016/17, but the effect was not evident in children aged 10-11. In both age groups, LA levels of childhood obesity in 2016/17 were significantly and positively associated with obesity levels in 2013/14. As these four cohorts comprise entirely different pupils, this underlines the importance of local drivers of childhood obesity.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher levels of local expenditure are unlikely to be effective in reducing childhood obesity in the short term.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30535272
pii: 5233861
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky252
pmc: PMC6660108
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
785-790Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K02325X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
Références
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Mar;64(3):194-201
pubmed: 19706622
Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Apr;34(4):624-32
pubmed: 20125100
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Sep;164(9):840-5
pubmed: 20819966
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Nov;165(11):993-8
pubmed: 22065180
Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 1):628-51
pubmed: 22924637
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Dec;112(12):1949-58
pubmed: 23174682
Pediatr Obes. 2013 Dec;8(6):411-7
pubmed: 23239616
J Sch Health. 2013 Mar;83(3):139-49
pubmed: 23343314
West J Nurs Res. 2013 Jul;35(6):742-59
pubmed: 23493675
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 May 15;177(10):1065-73
pubmed: 23579555
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Mar;21(3):572-5
pubmed: 23592665
Pediatrics. 2013 Oct;132(4):606-14
pubmed: 24043281
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):1006-13
pubmed: 24276843
Pediatr Obes. 2014 Dec;9(6):435-42
pubmed: 24311567
Pediatrics. 2014 Mar;133(3):422-30
pubmed: 24515513
BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 31;14:291
pubmed: 24678601
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Apr;44(4):870-86
pubmed: 25107487
J Immigr Minor Health. 2015 Apr;17(2):450-8
pubmed: 25138136
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(1):22-7
pubmed: 25372231
J Community Health. 2016 Feb;41(1):127-33
pubmed: 26280211
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Jan;24(1):184-90
pubmed: 26592489
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2602-2604
pubmed: 28622953