Water on hydrophobic surfaces: mechanistic modeling of polyethylene glycol-induced protein precipitation.
Industrial monoclonal antibody
Mechanistic modeling
Polyethylene glycol
Preparative protein precipitation
Water structure
Journal
Bioprocess and biosystems engineering
ISSN: 1615-7605
Titre abrégé: Bioprocess Biosyst Eng
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101088505
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
17
10
2018
accepted:
30
11
2018
pubmed:
12
12
2018
medline:
18
7
2019
entrez:
12
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For the purification of biopharmaceutical proteins, liquid chromatography is still the gold standard. Especially with increasing product titers, drawbacks like slow volumetric throughput and high resin costs lead to an intensifying need for alternative technologies. Selective preparative protein precipitation is one promising alternative technique. Although the capability has been proven, there has been no precipitation process realized for large-scale monoclonal antibody (mAb) production yet. One reason might be that the mechanism behind protein phase behavior is not completely understood and the precipitation process development is still empirical. Mechanistic modeling can be a means for faster, material-saving process development and a better process understanding at the same time. In preparative chromatography, mechanistic modeling was successfully shown for a variety of applications. Lately, a new isotherm for hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) under consideration of water molecules as participants was proposed, enabling an accurate description of HIC. In this work, based on similarities between protein precipitation and HIC, a new precipitation model was derived. In the proposed model, the formation of protein-protein interfaces is thought to be driven by hydrophobic effects, involving a reorganization of the well-ordered water structure on the hydrophobic surfaces of the protein-protein complex. To demonstrate model capability, high-throughput precipitation experiments with pure or prior to the experiments purified proteins lysozyme, myoglobin, bovine serum albumin, and one mAb were conducted at various pH values. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 was used as precipitant. The precipitant concentration as well as the initial protein concentration was varied systematically. For all investigated proteins, the initial protein concentrations were varied between 1.5 mg/mL and 12 mg/mL. The calibrated models were successfully validated with experimental data. This mechanistic description of protein precipitation process offers mathematical explanation of the precipitation behavior of proteins at PEG concentration, protein concentration, protein size, and pH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30535587
doi: 10.1007/s00449-018-2054-5
pii: 10.1007/s00449-018-2054-5
pmc: PMC6430756
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Serum Albumin, Bovine
27432CM55Q
Polyethylene Glycols
3WJQ0SDW1A
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
513-520Subventions
Organisme : European Union: Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
ID : 635557
Références
J Chromatogr A. 2007 Sep 21;1165(1-2):67-77
pubmed: 17698076
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Mar 1;102(4):1141-51
pubmed: 19031425
Biotechnol Prog. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):280-9
pubmed: 21312375
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1976 Apr;18(4):545-80
pubmed: 773449
J Chromatogr A. 2016 Sep 23;1465:71-8
pubmed: 27575919
J Chromatogr A. 2005 Jun 24;1079(1-2):229-35
pubmed: 16038309
N Biotechnol. 2011 Sep;28(5):458-63
pubmed: 21515428
Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1605-9
pubmed: 15361621
Prep Biochem. 1977;7(2):129-54
pubmed: 68470
Mol Biotechnol. 2013 Jan;53(1):92-107
pubmed: 23001867
J Chromatogr A. 2011 Dec 9;1218(49):8958-73
pubmed: 21868020
J Phys Chem B. 2009 Mar 26;113(12):3941-6
pubmed: 19245208
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977 Sep;183(1):200-15
pubmed: 907351
Biotechnol Prog. 2000 Jul-Aug;16(4):661-7
pubmed: 10933843
J Immunol Methods. 1992 Oct 19;155(1):129-32
pubmed: 1401962
J Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 10;241:87-97
pubmed: 27876584
J Am Chem Soc. 1946 Mar;68:459-75
pubmed: 21015743
Trends Biotechnol. 2013 Aug;31(8):479-92
pubmed: 23849674
J Biol Chem. 1981 Dec 10;256(23):12108-17
pubmed: 7298647
Biotechnol Prog. 2012 Jul;28(4):899-916
pubmed: 22641473
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8308-12
pubmed: 11607575
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016 Sep 5;128:216-225
pubmed: 27268946
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967 Feb 21;133(2):371-3
pubmed: 4166087
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007 Mar 15;848(1):8-18
pubmed: 16899415
Eng Life Sci. 2016 May 13;17(11):1142-1158
pubmed: 32624742
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jun;34(6):609-16
pubmed: 26792791
Biochem J. 1963 Nov;89:253-7
pubmed: 14084609
J Chem Phys. 2014 Dec 21;141(23):235103
pubmed: 25527962
J Chromatogr A. 2005 Jun 24;1079(1-2):221-8
pubmed: 16038308
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Mar 16;82:463-75
pubmed: 14148814
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 08;8:314
pubmed: 28642701
Biotechnol J. 2006 Feb;1(2):148-63
pubmed: 16892245
J Biotechnol. 2012 Jan 20;157(2):315-9
pubmed: 22001847