Gastric sub-epithelial tumors: identification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using CT with a practical scoring method.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
/ diagnosis
Humans
Lymph Nodes
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
/ diagnosis
Observer Variation
Prognosis
ROC Curve
Retrospective Studies
Stomach Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Young Adult
Diagnosis
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Neoplasms
Stomach
Tomography
X-ray computed
Journal
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
ISSN: 1436-3305
Titre abrégé: Gastric Cancer
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 100886238
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
16
10
2018
accepted:
26
11
2018
pubmed:
12
12
2018
medline:
31
12
2019
entrez:
12
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine CT features that can identify gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) among gastric sub-epithelial tumors (SETs) and to explore a practical scoring method. Sixty-four patients with gastric SETs (51 GISTs and 13 non-GISTs) from hospital I were included for primary analyses, and 92 (67 GISTs and 25 non-GISTs) from hospital II constituted a validation cohort. Pre-operative CT images were reviewed for imaging features: lesion location, growth pattern, lesion margin, enhancement pattern, dynamic pattern, attenuation at each phasic images and presence of necrosis, superficial ulcer, calcification, and peri-lesion enlarged lymph node (LN). Clinical and CT features were compared between the two groups (GISTs versus non-GISTs) and a GIST-risk scoring method was developed; then, its performance for identifying GISTs was tested in the validation cohort. Seven clinical and CT features were significantly suggestive of GISTs rather than non-GISTs: older age (> 49 years), non-cardial location, irregular margin, lower attenuation on unenhanced images (≤ 43 HU), heterogeneous enhancement, necrosis, and absence of enlarged LN (p < 0.05). At validation step, the established scoring method with cut-off score dichotomized into ≥ 4 versus < 4 for identifying GISTs revealed an AUC of 0.97 with an accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 100% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. Gastric GISTs have special CT and clinical features that differ from non-GISTs. With a simple and practical scoring method based on the significant features, GISTs can be accurately differentiated from non-GISTs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30535637
doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-00908-6
pii: 10.1007/s10120-018-00908-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
769-777Références
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jan;24(1):298-302
pubmed: 25277795
Dig Endosc. 2010 Oct;22(4):354-6
pubmed: 21175497
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3994-4000
pubmed: 26701702
Gastric Cancer. 2013 Jul;16(3):318-23
pubmed: 22907486
Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Jun;40(6):484-90
pubmed: 22351482
Korean J Radiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;13(4):425-33
pubmed: 22778564
Gastrointest Radiol. 1985;10(1):47-9
pubmed: 3871713
Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):924-34
pubmed: 19023576
Surg Pathol Clin. 2013 Sep;6(3):425-73
pubmed: 26839096
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Feb;83(2):250-60
pubmed: 24325848
Hum Pathol. 2012 May;43(5):650-9
pubmed: 22137423
Clin Radiol. 2008 May;63(5):536-42
pubmed: 18374717
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2149-57
pubmed: 25303921
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Jun;40(5):1164-9
pubmed: 25316564
J Hepatol. 2013 Jun;58(6):1188-93
pubmed: 23485522
Ann Surg. 2006 Jun;243(6):738-45; discussion 745-7
pubmed: 16772777
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;48(4):1155-1166
pubmed: 27384163
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Aug;49(12):2681-8
pubmed: 23664093
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 1;20(23):6105-16
pubmed: 25294914
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec 7;22(45):10015-10023
pubmed: 28018109
Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):3086-93
pubmed: 26699371
Radiology. 2009 Jul;252(1):92-100
pubmed: 19561251
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec;197(6):1351-9
pubmed: 22109289
Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Jan;29(1):52-68
pubmed: 15613856