Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Daily Liraglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Estonia.
Cost
Cost-effectiveness
Diabetes mellitus
Estonia
GLP-1 analogue
GLP-1 receptor agonist
Liraglutide
Semaglutide
Journal
Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
ISSN: 1869-6953
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101539025
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
12
10
2018
pubmed:
12
12
2018
medline:
12
12
2018
entrez:
12
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes that was associated with greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) versus once-daily GLP-1 analogue liraglutide in a recent network meta-analysis (NMA). The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus liraglutide 1.2 mg in Estonia. Outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model (version 9.0), with baseline cohort characteristics sourced from SUSTAIN 3 and changes in HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and BMI associated with once-weekly semaglutide and liraglutide derived from the NMA. Patients were assumed to receive once-weekly semaglutide or liraglutide for 5 years before intensifying to basal insulin. Treatment effects were applied for the first 5 years, after which HbA1c increased to 7.0%, SBP followed a natural progression, and BMI reverted to baseline for the remainder of the analysis. Costs were expressed in euros (EUR) and estimated from a healthcare payer perspective. Utilities associated with diabetes and diabetes-related complications were taken from published sources. Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.13 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus liraglutide 1.2 mg. Direct costs were EUR 67 higher with once-weekly semaglutide, due to the increased acquisition cost, but this was mostly offset by cost savings due to avoidance of diabetes-related complications. Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was therefore associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 523 per QALY gained versus liraglutide 1.2 mg, which falls well below a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 52,390 per QALY gained (three times the Estonian GDP per capita). Once-weekly semaglutide was considered highly cost-effective versus liraglutide 1.2 mg for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in Estonia. Novo Nordisk A/S. Plain language summary available for this article.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30535837
doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0542-x
pii: 10.1007/s13300-018-0542-x
pmc: PMC6349296
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
159-176Références
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):835-42
pubmed: 22999133
Diabetes Spectr. 2016 Aug;29(3):152-60
pubmed: 27574369
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24
pubmed: 25883405
Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701
pubmed: 30291106
Diabetes Care. 2004 Sep;27(9):2262-5
pubmed: 15333499
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53
pubmed: 9742976
Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):714-24
pubmed: 25236995
Diabetologia. 2001 Sep;44 Suppl 2:S14-21
pubmed: 11587045
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20 Suppl 1:S5-26
pubmed: 15324513
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20 Suppl 1:S27-40
pubmed: 15324514
Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb;41(2):258-266
pubmed: 29246950
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;6(4):275-286
pubmed: 29397376
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2149-58
pubmed: 24742660
Diabetologia. 2009 Oct;52(10):2046-55
pubmed: 19688338
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844
pubmed: 27633186
BMJ. 2006 Jan 14;332(7533):73-8
pubmed: 16371403
Diabet Med. 2011 Apr;28(4):504-5
pubmed: 21204957
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):416-426
pubmed: 30104301
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 May;5(5):341-354
pubmed: 28385659
Am Heart J. 2006 Jul;152(1):27-38
pubmed: 16824829
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Aug;22(8):1523-34
pubmed: 16870077
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Sep;34(9):1595-1603
pubmed: 29764222
Lancet. 2011 Jul 9;378(9786):156-67
pubmed: 21705063
Diabetologia. 2004 Oct;47(10):1747-59
pubmed: 15517152
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Jun;12(3):219-30
pubmed: 20224930
Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep;16(7):1251-65
pubmed: 17638121
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jul;34(7):1481-6
pubmed: 21593294
Diabet Med. 2005 Nov;22(11):1482-6
pubmed: 16241910
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Aug;6(8):605-617
pubmed: 29910024
Diabetologia. 2015 Mar;58(3):429-42
pubmed: 25583541
Eur J Gen Pract. 2010 Jun;16(2):85-91
pubmed: 20429704
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jun 03;11:90
pubmed: 23731777
Health Syst Transit. 2013;15(6):1-196
pubmed: 24334730
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22
pubmed: 27295427
BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):405-12
pubmed: 10938048
Lancet. 2010 Aug 7;376(9739):419-30
pubmed: 20594588
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1149-1167
pubmed: 29675798
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 7;358(6):580-91
pubmed: 18256393
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89
pubmed: 18784090
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72
pubmed: 18539916
BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317(7160):703-13
pubmed: 9732337
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):462-70
pubmed: 24969008
Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2645-50
pubmed: 24838908
Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):117-25
pubmed: 18191683