Measuring Value in Postacute Care.

Costs and cost analysis Patient outcome assessment Post-acute care Quality improvement Rehabilitation

Journal

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1532-821X
Titre abrégé: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985158R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2019
Historique:
received: 31 07 2018
revised: 06 11 2018
accepted: 10 11 2018
pubmed: 12 12 2018
medline: 8 1 2020
entrez: 12 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The value of postacute care (PAC) is unclear. While experienced clinicians understand the appropriateness of each specific site of PAC, clear evidence-based guidelines are not available, and many referrals to PAC today are made based on bed availability rather than patient need. Measuring value (value=outcomes/cost) for the entire episode of care has been proposed as an effective method to both evaluate and enable faster innovation in care. Instituting value-based care will increase patient engagement, improve quality and reduce cost with the potential of unifying the goals for all stakeholders-patients and families, providers, and payers. To achieve a goal of value-based care, rehabilitation researchers will need to measure outcomes and cost for the entire episode of care. Recent laudable efforts by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to standardize data across PAC may not include the entire episode of care since outpatient care and measurement from home are not included. In addition, the true cost of services delivered is rarely measured. To implement value-based care in rehabilitation and facilitate cost-effective care improvements, outcomes research in PAC should focus on 4 areas. First, outcome measures need to reflect the patient's perspective. Second, new methods must be implemented to acquire comparable valid and reliable data from all postacute settings and the home. Third, a predictive model for individual patients should be utilized to guide patient referral from acute care to PAC and monitor progress. And fourth, timely specific measures of true cost (resources consumed) for the outcomes achieved are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30537489
pii: S0003-9993(18)31514-4
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

990-994

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

John F Butzer (JF)

John F. Butzer Center for Research and Innovation, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI; Division of Rehabilitation, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI. Electronic address: john.butzer@maryfreebed.com.

Allan J Kozlowski (AJ)

John F. Butzer Center for Research and Innovation, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI; Division of Rehabilitation, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI.

Roberta Virva (R)

John F. Butzer Center for Research and Innovation, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI; Division of Rehabilitation, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH