Gynecologic radiation oncology patients report unmet needs regarding sexual health communication with providers.
Aged
Cohort Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genital Neoplasms, Female
/ psychology
Health Communication
Health Personnel
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Middle Aged
Needs Assessment
Patient Preference
Physician-Patient Relations
Prognosis
Radiation Oncology
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
/ psychology
Sexual Health
Survivors
/ psychology
Gynecological cancer
Radiation therapy
Sexual dysfunction
Sexual history taking
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
27
11
2018
accepted:
04
12
2018
pubmed:
13
12
2018
medline:
1
3
2019
entrez:
13
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Following radiation therapy (RT), women with gynecologic malignancies report high rates of sexual dysfunction, but little is known regarding sexual health communication between these patients and health-care providers. This study assessed these patients' beliefs/attitudes toward providers' sexual history taking. Surveys were administered to women who presented for follow-up care for gynecologic cancers in an academic radiation oncology department. The surveys assessed patient sexual health beliefs and inquiry preferences. Sexual functioning was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Ordered logistic regressions were performed to assess for correlations between survey responses, FSFI, and demographic characteristics. Seventy-five subjects participated. Most (89.8%) had FSFI scores indicating sexual dysfunction. Most patients agreed that sexual function is an important component of overall health (78.7%) and that providers should inquire regularly (62.8%). Few (12.0%) reported embarrassment around provider discussions. Most (62.7%) preferred discussion with female providers, especially married patients (p = 0.03). Half (53.4%) agreed that sexual problems are an unavoidable part of aging, a view that was more common as education level decreased (p = 0.01). Most (62.7%) patients agreed that providers should regularly ask about their sexual history, with patients having significant differences in education level. Patients with low FSFI scores were less likely to report inquiry from their OB/Gyn (p = 0.03). Gynecologic cancer radiotherapy patients want to discuss sexual health, but report suboptimal provider inquiry. Patient views and experiences varied based on marital status, education level, and FSFI score. This work highlights the need for improved sexual health communication between cancer patients and providers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30539283
doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2813-3
pii: 10.1007/s00432-018-2813-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
495-502Subventions
Organisme : Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
ID : K12 HD001438
Organisme : National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
ID : UL1TR000433
Références
J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208
pubmed: 10782451
Cancer Nurs. 2000 Jun;23(3):230-6
pubmed: 10851774
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905
pubmed: 11113727
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb;84-A(2):309-15
pubmed: 11861738
J Paediatr Child Health. 2001 Dec;37(6):531-8
pubmed: 11903829
World J Urol. 2002 Jun;20(2):74-8
pubmed: 12107536
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;15(1):57-61
pubmed: 12544503
Psychooncology. 2003 Apr-May;12(3):267-79
pubmed: 12673810
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):313-9
pubmed: 12692665
Diabet Med. 2003 Jun;20(6):486-90
pubmed: 12786685
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Sep;57(5):791-806
pubmed: 12850107
Urology. 2003 Sep;62(3):514-8
pubmed: 12946757
J Affect Disord. 2004 Oct 15;82(2):235-43
pubmed: 15488252
Anaesthesia. 2005 Jan;60(1):53-9
pubmed: 15601273
J Sex Marital Ther. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1):1-20
pubmed: 15841702
Ann Surg. 2005 Aug;242(2):212-23
pubmed: 16041212
J Sex Med. 2006 Mar;3(2):201-11
pubmed: 16490013
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006 Jul;21(4):310-5
pubmed: 16755199
N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):762-74
pubmed: 17715410
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007 Oct-Dec;30(4):329-42
pubmed: 18025868
Contemp Nurse. 2007 Dec;27(1):49-60
pubmed: 18386955
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Sex Med. 2009 May;6(5):1349-57
pubmed: 19228279
J Sex Med. 2010 Feb;7(2 Pt 2):873-80
pubmed: 19912497
J Sex Med. 2010 Jan;7(1 Pt 2):349-73
pubmed: 20092444
J Sex Res. 2011 Mar;48(2-3):106-17
pubmed: 21409708
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Feb;23(2):145-52
pubmed: 21796468
J Sex Med. 2011 Dec;8(12):3251-3
pubmed: 22133418
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Mar;21(3):326-33
pubmed: 22150099
Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4606-18
pubmed: 22359250
J Sex Med. 2012 May;9(5):1285-94
pubmed: 22443146
J Sex Med. 2012 Jun;9(6):1697-704
pubmed: 22548752
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):e187-93
pubmed: 22572074
Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb;37(1):101-6
pubmed: 22643563
J Sex Med. 2013 Feb;10 Suppl 1:53-64
pubmed: 23387912
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S110-27
pubmed: 2646486
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437
pubmed: 27626365
Ann Intern Med. 1985 Apr;102(4):520-8
pubmed: 3977198
Md State Med J. 1983 Apr;32(4):260-5
pubmed: 6865482
J Health Soc Behav. 1981 Mar;22(1):18-30
pubmed: 7240703
Psychosom Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;60(4):458-65
pubmed: 9710291