Evaluation of age-related differences in anterior cruciate ligament size.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
/ pathology
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
/ diagnostic imaging
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Female
Femur
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Knee Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Meniscus
Middle Aged
Organ Size
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult
Aging
Anatomy
Anterior cruciate ligament
Body size
Knee size
Size
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
02
10
2018
accepted:
07
12
2018
pubmed:
13
12
2018
medline:
20
4
2019
entrez:
13
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to reveal the relation between age and the morphological characteristics of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-seven young subjects who were diagnosed with a meniscus injury without ACL tear using MRI (15 male and 22 female, median age 26, range 15-49), and 33 elderly subjects for whom knee MRI was performed before uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (11 male and 22 female, median age 77, range 60-83), were included in this study. In the elderly group, healthy ACL gross morphology was confirmed macroscopically during surgery. In all knees, ACL was detected without any intensity alteration. In the MRI evaluation, using the axial slice revealing the greatest length between the medial and lateral epicondyle of the femur, axial ACL size was evaluated. Using the coronal plane image, the sagittal image was sliced parallel with the native ACL. In the sagittal image of the MRI, the largest area of the ACL was measured. Statistical analysis was performed to reveal the correlation between age and ACL size. Both axial and sagittal ACL areas were compared between the young and elderly groups. Age and sagittal ACL area were significantly correlated (Pearson's coefficient correlation: - 0.353, P = 0.003). The sagittal ACL area was significantly larger in the young group when compared with the elderly group (P = 0.001). However, when the sagittal ACL area was normalized by the length of Blumensaat's line, no significant difference was observed. For clinical relevance, sagittal ACL size was significantly larger in young subjects. The reason for this difference is likely the difference in knee size. When performing anatomical studies of the ACL using cadaveric knees of elderly specimens, there is the possibility that the ACL size will be underestimated. Considering that the ACL surgery is mainly performed for young subjects, cadavers of younger age should be used in such studies. Diagnostic study, Level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30539304
doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5336-1
pii: 10.1007/s00167-018-5336-1
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
223-229Références
Arthroscopy. 2006 Mar;22(3):240-51
pubmed: 16517306
Arthroscopy. 2007 Jun;23(6):618-28
pubmed: 17560476
Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):154-61
pubmed: 18237698
Arthroscopy. 2008 May;24(5):585-92
pubmed: 18442692
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Sep;36(9):1675-87
pubmed: 18490472
Am J Sports Med. 1991 May-Jun;19(3):217-25
pubmed: 1867330
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Mar;17(3):213-9
pubmed: 19139847
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Jul;17(7):812-7
pubmed: 19421737
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Sep;18(9):1226-31
pubmed: 20390250
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):108-13
pubmed: 20847222
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Aug;19(8):1233-8
pubmed: 21350960
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 20;93(8):789-97
pubmed: 21508287
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1789-99
pubmed: 21596902
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):2016-26
pubmed: 21602567
J Knee Surg. 2011 Mar;24(1):39-43
pubmed: 21618937
Arthroscopy. 2011 Sep;27(9):1235-41
pubmed: 21764541
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):696-704
pubmed: 22006159
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):664-70
pubmed: 22527419
Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct;28(10):1481-9
pubmed: 22796141
Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Mar;5(1):26-35
pubmed: 23467279
J Orthop Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):97-103
pubmed: 24141392
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014 Jun;26(2):97-105
pubmed: 24944975
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Nov;23(11):3157-62
pubmed: 24951954
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):640-8
pubmed: 25086574
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):680-6
pubmed: 25380972
Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar;31(3):435-44
pubmed: 25530509
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul;31(7):1412-7
pubmed: 25749530
World J Orthop. 2015 Mar 18;6(2):252-62
pubmed: 25793165
J Physiol Anthropol. 2015 Dec 08;34:41
pubmed: 26642759
Obes Rev. 2016 Mar;17(3):262-75
pubmed: 26663309
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1638-1645
pubmed: 27193008
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1110-1116
pubmed: 28289820
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):485-490
pubmed: 28647841
J Knee Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):568-572
pubmed: 28743140
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2646-2652
pubmed: 30059247