Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health.
Primary care
health information
health systems
indicators
performance assessment
Journal
The European journal of general practice
ISSN: 1751-1402
Titre abrégé: Eur J Gen Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9513566
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
13
12
2018
medline:
23
11
2019
entrez:
13
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country's primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Expert Panel) to provide an opinion on ways for improving performance assessment of primary care. To provide an overview of domains and dimensions to be taken into consideration in assessing primary care and specific indicators to be collected and analysed to improve understanding of primary care performance. A sub-group of the Expert Panel performed a literature review. The opinion was drafted, improved and approved through working-group discussions, consultations with the EC, the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment, and a public hearing. Drawing on the main characteristics of primary care, we propose essential elements of a primary care performance assessment system based on specific indicators. We identified ten domains with accompanying dimensions for which comparative key indicators and descriptive indicators are proposed: (1) universal and accessible care, (2) integrated, (3) person-centred, (4) comprehensive and community-oriented care, (5) provided by a team accountable for addressing a vast majority of personal health needs, (6) sustained partnership with patients and informal caregivers, (7) coordination, (8) continuity of care, (9) primary care organization, and (10) human resources. The identified characteristics and criteria for development of a primary care performance assessment system provides a starting point for strengthening the coherence of assessment frameworks across countries and exchanging best practices.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country's primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Expert Panel) to provide an opinion on ways for improving performance assessment of primary care.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To provide an overview of domains and dimensions to be taken into consideration in assessing primary care and specific indicators to be collected and analysed to improve understanding of primary care performance.
METHODS
METHODS
A sub-group of the Expert Panel performed a literature review. The opinion was drafted, improved and approved through working-group discussions, consultations with the EC, the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment, and a public hearing.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Drawing on the main characteristics of primary care, we propose essential elements of a primary care performance assessment system based on specific indicators. We identified ten domains with accompanying dimensions for which comparative key indicators and descriptive indicators are proposed: (1) universal and accessible care, (2) integrated, (3) person-centred, (4) comprehensive and community-oriented care, (5) provided by a team accountable for addressing a vast majority of personal health needs, (6) sustained partnership with patients and informal caregivers, (7) coordination, (8) continuity of care, (9) primary care organization, and (10) human resources.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The identified characteristics and criteria for development of a primary care performance assessment system provides a starting point for strengthening the coherence of assessment frameworks across countries and exchanging best practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30539675
doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284
pmc: PMC6394311
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
55-61Références
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1150-60
pubmed: 16012155
Fam Pract. 2008 Aug;25(4):312-7
pubmed: 18562335
BMJ. 2009 Oct 28;339:b4372
pubmed: 19864686
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 27;11:81
pubmed: 20979612
Health Serv Manage Res. 2011 Aug;24(3):114-20
pubmed: 21840896
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Oct 20;12:115
pubmed: 22014310
Gac Sanit. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:20-6
pubmed: 22265645
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):686-94
pubmed: 23569048
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:6-9
pubmed: 24863106
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Jan;11(1):17-38
pubmed: 25819303
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Mar;18(2):183-187
pubmed: 28003038
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;201:103-110
pubmed: 29471179
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Apr;14(2):141-161
pubmed: 29547363
JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8
pubmed: 3045356
BMJ. 1998 Nov 14;317(7169):1354-60
pubmed: 9812935