Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in gastroenteropancreatic NEN G3: a multicenter cohort study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Intestinal Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Neuroendocrine Tumors
/ diagnostic imaging
Octreotide
/ adverse effects
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Radioisotopes
/ adverse effects
Receptors, Peptide
/ metabolism
Retrospective Studies
Stomach Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
177Lutetium
90Yttrium
high-grade
neuroendocrine carcinoma
neuroendocrine neoplasm
neuroendocrine tumors
overall survival
peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
progression-free survival
radiolabeled somatostatin analogues
Journal
Endocrine-related cancer
ISSN: 1479-6821
Titre abrégé: Endocr Relat Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9436481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
received:
15
11
2018
accepted:
23
11
2018
entrez:
13
12
2018
pubmed:
13
12
2018
medline:
4
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors grade 1-2 (G1-G2). However, its possible benefit in high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN G3) is largely unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the benefits and side effects of PRRT in patients with GEP NEN G3. We performed a retrospective cohort study at 12 centers to assess the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT in patients with GEP NEN G3. Outcomes were response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. We included 149 patients (primary tumor: pancreatic n = 89, gastrointestinal n = 34, unknown n = 26). PRRT was first-line (n = 30), second-line (n = 62) or later-line treatment (n = 57). Of 114 patients evaluated, 1% had complete response, 41% partial response, 38% stable disease and 20% progressive disease. Of 104 patients with documented progressive disease before PRRT, disease control rate was 69%. The total cohort had median PFS of 14 months and OS of 29 months. Ki-67 21-54% (n = 125) vs Ki-67 ≥55% (n = 23): PFS 16 vs 6 months (P < 0.001) and OS 31 vs 9 months (P < 0.001). Well (n = 60) vs poorly differentiated NEN (n = 62): PFS 19 vs 8 months (P < 0.001) and OS 44 vs 19 months (P < 0.001). Grade 3-4 hematological or renal toxicity occurred in 17% of patients. This large multicenter cohort of patients with GEP NEN G3 treated with PRRT demonstrates promising response rates, disease control rates, PFS and OS as well as toxicity in patients with mainly progressive disease. Based on these results, PRRT may be considered for patients with GEP NEN G3.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30540557
doi: 10.1530/ERC-18-0424
pii: ERC-18-0424
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Radioisotopes
0
Receptors, Peptide
0
Octreotide
RWM8CCW8GP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM