Predicting instructed simulation and dissimulation when screening for depressive symptoms.


Journal

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
ISSN: 1433-8491
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9103030

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 01 03 2018
accepted: 06 12 2018
pubmed: 14 12 2018
medline: 11 11 2020
entrez: 14 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The intentional distortion of test results presents a fundamental problem to self-report-based psychiatric assessment, such as screening for depressive symptoms. The first objective of the study was to clarify whether depressed patients like healthy controls possess both the cognitive ability and motivation to deliberately influence results of commonly used screening measures. The second objective was the construction of a method derived directly from within the test takers' responses to systematically detect faking behavior. Supervised machine learning algorithms posit the potential to empirically learn the implicit interconnections between responses, which shape detectable faking patterns. In a standardized design, faking bad and faking good were experimentally induced in a matched sample of 150 depressed and 150 healthy subjects. Participants completed commonly used questionnaires to detect depressive and associated symptoms. Group differences throughout experimental conditions were evaluated using linear mixed-models. Machine learning algorithms were trained on the test results and compared regarding their capacity to systematically predict distortions in response behavior in two scenarios: (1) differentiation of authentic patient responses from simulated responses of healthy participants; (2) differentiation of authentic patient responses from dissimulated patient responses. Statistically significant convergence of the test scores in both faking conditions suggests that both depressive patients and healthy controls have the cognitive ability as well as the motivational compliance to alter their test results. Evaluation of the algorithmic capability to detect faking behavior yielded ideal predictive accuracies of up to 89%. Implications of the findings, as well as future research objectives are discussed. Trial Registration The study was pre-registered at the German registry for clinical trials (Deutsches Register klinischer Studien, DRKS; DRKS00007708).

Identifiants

pubmed: 30542818
doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0967-2
pii: 10.1007/s00406-018-0967-2
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

153-168

Références

Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;178:200-6
pubmed: 11230029
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 May;39(5):593-7
pubmed: 7092490
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):301-16
pubmed: 21967296
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1436-1442
pubmed: 25381021
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jan;91(1):9-24
pubmed: 16435935
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Dec;64(6):1425-30
pubmed: 8991329
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Aug;14(6):511-5
pubmed: 14590578
Eur Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;20(5-6):416-21
pubmed: 16171656
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Nov 30;161(2):153-61
pubmed: 18926572
Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Sep;22(5):896-918
pubmed: 18756391
J Abnorm Psychol. 1981 Aug;90(4):286-97
pubmed: 7264058
Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 15;28(3):663-8
pubmed: 16169252
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jul;132(1-2):104-11
pubmed: 21420177
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;167(7):748-51
pubmed: 20595427
Biometrics. 2003 Sep;59(3):614-23
pubmed: 14601762
J Affect Disord. 2010 Aug;124(3):262-9
pubmed: 20089311
Psychiatr Prax. 2014 May;41(4):195-9
pubmed: 23868715
Assessment. 2000 Mar;7(1):55-62
pubmed: 10668005
Pain Pract. 2007 Jun;7(2):178-204
pubmed: 17559488
Nervenarzt. 2003 Nov;74(11):977-86
pubmed: 14598034
Eur J Pharmacol. 2010 Jan 10;626(1):83-6
pubmed: 19835870
Psychopathology. 1993;26(1):6-12
pubmed: 8511231
Stat Med. 2005 Jul 15;24(13):2025-40
pubmed: 15900606
Cancer Inform. 2007 Feb 11;2:59-77
pubmed: 19458758
Eur Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;17(1):46-54
pubmed: 11918993
Am J Psychiatry. 1973 Sep;130(9):966-71
pubmed: 4727774
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Jan 15;157(1-3):191-200
pubmed: 17977603
Psychol Methods. 2003 Jun;8(2):206-24
pubmed: 12924815
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Oct;56(5):582-91
pubmed: 26043667
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 1;189:314-20
pubmed: 26458184
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;66(7):700-12
pubmed: 19581561
Bioinformatics. 2010 May 15;26(10):1340-7
pubmed: 20385727
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Oct;86(5):943-53
pubmed: 11596810

Auteurs

Stephan Goerigk (S)

Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany. stephan.goerigk@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336, Munich, Germany. stephan.goerigk@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Hochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany. stephan.goerigk@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Sven Hilbert (S)

Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Faculty of Psychology, Educational Science and Sport Science, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Andrea Jobst (A)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Peter Falkai (P)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Markus Bühner (M)

Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Clemens Stachl (C)

Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Bernd Bischl (B)

Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Stefan Coors (S)

Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Thomas Ehring (T)

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Frank Padberg (F)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Nina Sarubin (N)

Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Hochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH