Anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa: an innovative metrical assessment based on 3D segmentation on head CT-scan.
3D segmentation
Anatomy
CT-scan
Pterygopalatine fossa
Journal
Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA
ISSN: 1279-8517
Titre abrégé: Surg Radiol Anat
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8608029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
01
09
2018
accepted:
07
12
2018
pubmed:
14
12
2018
medline:
7
5
2019
entrez:
14
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The pterygopalatine fossa is an important anatomical structure for several surgical and anaesthesiologic procedures; yet, very few data are available about its size. This study aims at providing a metrical assessment of pterygopalatine fossa through an innovative 3D segmentation procedure on head CT-scans. CT-scans from 100 patients (50 males and 50 females) aged between 18 and 85 years were chosen for the study. Right and left pterygopalatine fossae were segmented through ITK-SNAP open source software. Height and volume were calculated on the acquired 3D models. In addition, anterior-posterior nasal spine distance, upper facial height (nasion-prosthion) and biorbital breadth (ectoconchion-ectoconchion) were measured as well. Statistically significant differences of height and volume according to sex and side were assessed through two-way ANOVA test: sexually dimorphic measurements were further assessed through one-way ANCOVA test using the three cranial measurements as covariates (p < 0.05). On average pterygopalatine fossa height was 24.1 ± 3.5 mm in males, and 22.8 ± 3.4 mm in females, whereas volume was 0.930 ± 0.181 cm The present study highlighted the sexual dimorphism of pterygopalatine fossa: results may improve the knowledge of this anatomical structure difficult to explore, but crucial in several fields of clinics and surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30542926
doi: 10.1007/s00276-018-2153-7
pii: 10.1007/s00276-018-2153-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
523-528Références
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2003 Nov-Dec;27(6):481-7
pubmed: 14575781
Am J Rhinol. 2005 May-Jun;19(3):288-92
pubmed: 16011136
Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E5
pubmed: 16078819
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 May;18(3):586-90
pubmed: 17538322
J Neurosurg. 2007 Oct;107(4):805-8
pubmed: 17937227
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 May;39(5):493-6
pubmed: 19959336
Clin Anat. 2011 Jul;24(5):576-82
pubmed: 21400608
Laryngoscope. 2012 Jan;122(1):6-12
pubmed: 22086784
Surg Radiol Anat. 2013 Mar;35(2):143-59
pubmed: 22918475
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2014 Oct;75(5):346-53
pubmed: 25276600
Anat Sci Int. 2017 Jan;92(1):98-106
pubmed: 26663153
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(2):20150327
pubmed: 26783044
Insights Imaging. 2016 Aug;7(4):589-99
pubmed: 27230518
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017 May;68(2):122-130
pubmed: 27932266
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Sep;28(6):1537-1540
pubmed: 28749840
Surg Radiol Anat. 2018 Feb;40(2):185-191
pubmed: 28856438
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981 May;51(5):468-70
pubmed: 6941133
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Oct;35(5):328-33
pubmed: 9427441