Learning Electromagnetic Navigational Bronchoscopy and Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy (LEAP): A Pilot Study.
Journal
Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology
ISSN: 1948-8270
Titre abrégé: J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101496866
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
14
12
2018
medline:
26
3
2019
entrez:
14
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prior studies in pulmonology have examined the validity of procedural training tools, however, translation of simulation skill acquisition into real world competency remains understudied. We examine an assessment process with a simulation training course for electromagnetic navigational (EMN) bronchoscopy and percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration (PTTNA). A cohort study was conducted by subjects using EMN bronchoscopy and PTTNA. A procedural assessment tool was developed to measure basic competency for EMN bronchoscopy and PTTNA at 3 different time points: first simulation case, final simulation case upon reaching a competent score, and at their first live case. The assessment tool was divided into 4 domains (total score, 4 to 16; competency ≥12) with each domain requiring a passing score (1 to 4; competency ≥3.0). Complication and procedural time were collected during their first live case. Twenty-two serial procedures (12 EMN bronchoscopies, 10 EMN PTTNA) were observed by 14 subjects. The mean first simulation score for EMN bronchoscopy (4.66±0.89) improved after cadaver simulation (12.67±0.89, median 3 simulations attempts). The subjects' mean score for their first live case was 13.0±0.85 (self-reported score 12.5±1.07). For EMN PTTNA, the mean first simulation score (4.3±2.40) improved after cadaver simulation (12.6±1.51, median 3 simulation attempts). The subjects' mean score for their first live PTTNA case was 12.5±2.87 (self-reported score 12.1±1.05). There was only 1 minor complication. Learning EMN bronchoscopy/PTTNA is feasible using a structured simulation course with an assessment tool.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Prior studies in pulmonology have examined the validity of procedural training tools, however, translation of simulation skill acquisition into real world competency remains understudied. We examine an assessment process with a simulation training course for electromagnetic navigational (EMN) bronchoscopy and percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration (PTTNA).
METHODS
METHODS
A cohort study was conducted by subjects using EMN bronchoscopy and PTTNA. A procedural assessment tool was developed to measure basic competency for EMN bronchoscopy and PTTNA at 3 different time points: first simulation case, final simulation case upon reaching a competent score, and at their first live case. The assessment tool was divided into 4 domains (total score, 4 to 16; competency ≥12) with each domain requiring a passing score (1 to 4; competency ≥3.0). Complication and procedural time were collected during their first live case.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-two serial procedures (12 EMN bronchoscopies, 10 EMN PTTNA) were observed by 14 subjects. The mean first simulation score for EMN bronchoscopy (4.66±0.89) improved after cadaver simulation (12.67±0.89, median 3 simulations attempts). The subjects' mean score for their first live case was 13.0±0.85 (self-reported score 12.5±1.07). For EMN PTTNA, the mean first simulation score (4.3±2.40) improved after cadaver simulation (12.6±1.51, median 3 simulation attempts). The subjects' mean score for their first live PTTNA case was 12.5±2.87 (self-reported score 12.1±1.05). There was only 1 minor complication.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Learning EMN bronchoscopy/PTTNA is feasible using a structured simulation course with an assessment tool.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30543552
doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000520
pmc: PMC6298825
mid: NIHMS963166
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
55-61Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007534
Pays : United States
Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Dec 15;164(12):2248-55
pubmed: 11751195
Acad Med. 2008 Aug;83(8):761-7
pubmed: 18667892
Acad Med. 1991 Sep;66(9):545-8
pubmed: 1883454
Chest. 2010 May;137(5):1040-9
pubmed: 19858234
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 30;10:83
pubmed: 20353577
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct 15;186(8):773-9
pubmed: 22837376
Chest. 2013 Jul;144(1):183-192
pubmed: 23370487
Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7
pubmed: 2400509
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2013 Sep;111:24-33
pubmed: 24072944
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2014 Oct;21(4):314-21
pubmed: 25321450
Med Educ. 2015 Feb;49(2):161-73
pubmed: 25626747
Chest. 2015 Aug;148(2):321-332
pubmed: 25674901
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Apr;12(4):579-86
pubmed: 25700209
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jan;8(1):186-94
pubmed: 26904228
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):502-11
pubmed: 26989810
Health Educ. 1981 May-Jun;12(3):14-8
pubmed: 6792124
Br J Surg. 1997 Feb;84(2):273-8
pubmed: 9052454
Acad Med. 1998 Sep;73(9):993-7
pubmed: 9759104