A Critique of O'Byrne's Understanding of Ethnography and the Politics of Public Health Research.

North America North Americans community and public health content analysis equality inequality methodology qualitative research design research strategies social issues

Journal

Qualitative health research
ISSN: 1049-7323
Titre abrégé: Qual Health Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9202144

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 15 12 2018
medline: 15 12 2018
entrez: 15 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patrick O'Byrne criticizes the use of ethnography in public health research focused on cultural groups. His main argument is that ethnography disciplines marginalized populations that do not respect the imperative of health. In this article, I argue that O'Byrne has an erroneous understanding of ethnography and the politics of scientific research. My main argument is that a methodology itself cannot discipline individuals. I argue that if data are used as a basis to develop problematic public health policies, the issue is the policies themselves and not the methodology used to collect the data. While O'Byrne discourages researchers from conducting health research like ethnography focused on cultural groups, I argue the exact opposite. This has to do with justice and equity for marginalized communities and the obligation to tailor health services for their specific needs, which may not be the same as those of the general population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30547734
doi: 10.1177/1049732318808802
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Comment

Langues

eng

Pagination

739-746

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : 201610GSD-385545-283387
Pays : Canada

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Julien Brisson (J)

1 University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Classifications MeSH