Developing a list of invasive alien species likely to threaten biodiversity and ecosystems in the European Union.
biological invasions
consensus approach
environmental policy
impacts
introductions
prioritization
risk assessment
Journal
Global change biology
ISSN: 1365-2486
Titre abrégé: Glob Chang Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9888746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
25
07
2018
accepted:
07
11
2018
pubmed:
15
12
2018
medline:
12
4
2019
entrez:
15
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The European Union (EU) has recently published its first list of invasive alien species (IAS) of EU concern to which current legislation must apply. The list comprises species known to pose great threats to biodiversity and needs to be maintained and updated. Horizon scanning is seen as critical to identify the most threatening potential IAS that do not yet occur in Europe to be subsequently risk assessed for future listing. Accordingly, we present a systematic consensus horizon scanning procedure to derive a ranked list of potential IAS likely to arrive, establish, spread and have an impact on biodiversity in the region over the next decade. The approach is unique in the continental scale examined, the breadth of taxonomic groups and environments considered, and the methods and data sources used. International experts were brought together to address five broad thematic groups of potential IAS. For each thematic group the experts first independently assembled lists of potential IAS not yet established in the EU but potentially threatening biodiversity if introduced. Experts were asked to score the species within their thematic group for their separate likelihoods of i) arrival, ii) establishment, iii) spread, and iv) magnitude of the potential negative impact on biodiversity within the EU. Experts then convened for a 2-day workshop applying consensus methods to compile a ranked list of potential IAS. From an initial working list of 329 species, a list of 66 species not yet established in the EU that were considered to be very high (8 species), high (40 species) or medium (18 species) risk species was derived. Here, we present these species highlighting the potential negative impacts and the most likely biogeographic regions to be affected by these potential IAS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30548757
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14527
pmc: PMC7380041
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1032-1048Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun;32(6):464-474
pubmed: 28395941
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Dec;20(12):3859-71
pubmed: 24839235
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Nov;21(11):4128-40
pubmed: 26152518
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Mar;25(3):1032-1048
pubmed: 30548757
Conserv Biol. 2012 Apr;26(2):267-77
pubmed: 22236256
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Dec;24(12):686-93
pubmed: 19712994
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Dec;19(12):3740-8
pubmed: 23913552
Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):317-8
pubmed: 26469026
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Sep;22(9):3067-79
pubmed: 26748862
Nat Commun. 2017 Feb 15;8:14435
pubmed: 28198420
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr;28(4):212-8
pubmed: 23153723
Science. 2009 Apr 3;324(5923):40-1
pubmed: 19342572
PLoS Biol. 2014 May 06;12(5):e1001850
pubmed: 24802715
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Oct;24(10):523-7
pubmed: 19660827
PLoS Biol. 2015 Apr 15;13(4):e1002130
pubmed: 25875845
Ecol Lett. 2012 Dec;15(12):1475-93
pubmed: 23020170