Design and validation of a "Peristomal Lesion Scale" for peristomal skin assessment.
ostomates
ostomy
peristomal skin assessment
scale development
validation study
Journal
International wound journal
ISSN: 1742-481X
Titre abrégé: Int Wound J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101230907
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
24
09
2018
revised:
14
11
2018
accepted:
20
11
2018
pubmed:
15
12
2018
medline:
6
8
2019
entrez:
15
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many people in Italy undergo ostomy because of illness, and this can have negative psychological and physical effects. It is estimated that 15%-43% of ostomates suffer from skin complications in the peristomal area. During their life, many ostomates experience at least one peristomal lesion, and they turn to stomal therapy centres where trained nurses provide patient care and manage skin complications. To ensure a good quality of life for patients, and to take prompt action for the prevention and treatment of stomal lesions, it is essential to use appropriate assessment tools. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable peristomal skin assessment tool (Peristomal Lesion Scale [PLS]) for classifying lesions based on their severity; and to compare its validity with the most widely used peristomal tool in Italy, SACS. The new tool was designed by a team of experts, focusing on patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, and classification of the lesions by severity and topography. The results of this comparative validation study indicate that the PLS better discriminates lesions by their severity because of its level of detail, using a standardised terminology, and its completeness. The PLS is a valid tool for use in the daily work of stomal therapists.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30548924
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13052
pmc: PMC7949408
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Pagination
433-441Informations de copyright
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 Nov-Dec;35(6):596-607; quiz 608-9
pubmed: 19018200
Br J Nurs. 2012 Dec 13-2013 Jan 9;21(22):1312-5
pubmed: 23249795
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Mar-Apr;40(2):131-4
pubmed: 23466718
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2015 Jun;28(6):275-84; quiz 285-6
pubmed: 25988737
Colorectal Dis. 2003 Jan;5(1):49-52
pubmed: 12780927
Wound Repair Regen. 2004 May-Jun;12(3 Suppl):S1-17
pubmed: 15230830
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;40(5):489-500; quiz E1-2
pubmed: 23880641
Br J Nurs. 2010 Aug 12-Sep 8;19(15):960, 932-4
pubmed: 20966862
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Feb;164(2):330-5
pubmed: 20973766
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;44(4):350-357
pubmed: 28574928
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007 Sep;53(9):38-43
pubmed: 17893429
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jan;25(1):125-33
pubmed: 26123983
Int Wound J. 2019 Apr;16(2):433-441
pubmed: 30548924
Chirurg. 2016 Feb;87(2):144-50
pubmed: 26127020
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;22(2):139-43
pubmed: 19918185
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2015 Aug;61(8):26-34
pubmed: 26291898
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Oct;56(10):22-38
pubmed: 21030726
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010 Dec 21;5:1-5
pubmed: 21311696
Br J Dermatol. 2008 Nov;159(5):1211-2
pubmed: 18795914
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Apr;49(4):17-8
pubmed: 12732738
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010 Sep-Oct;37(5):505-10
pubmed: 20736859
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988 Oct;19(4):623-8
pubmed: 3053801
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Jun;26(2):112-21
pubmed: 24436659
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Dec;42(12):1569-74
pubmed: 10613475
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;34(1):57-69
pubmed: 17228209
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Mar;24(3):249-57
pubmed: 20465716
Br J Nurs. 2010 Sep 23-Oct 13;19(17):S6-S15
pubmed: 20871505