Two distinct mechanisms of selection in working memory: Additive last-item and retro-cue benefits.
Attention
Focus of attention
Hierarchical-Bayes
Recency
Retro-cue
Speed-accuracy trade-off
Working memory
Journal
Cognition
ISSN: 1873-7838
Titre abrégé: Cognition
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0367541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
09
08
2017
revised:
22
11
2018
accepted:
30
11
2018
pubmed:
15
12
2018
medline:
7
3
2020
entrez:
15
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In working memory research, individual items are sometimes said to be in the "focus of attention". According to one view, this occurs for the last item in a sequentially presented list (last-item benefit). According to a second view, this occurs when items are externally cued during the retention interval (retro-cue benefit). We investigated both phenomena at the same time to determine whether both result from the same cognitive mechanisms. If that were the case, retro-cue benefits should be reduced when the retro-cue is directed to the item that already benefits from being presented last. We measured speed-accuracy-tradeoff functions with the response-deadline paradigm to measure retrieval dynamics in a short-term recognition task. Across three experiments, we found that retro-cues benefited the last item and other items to the same extent. The additivity of the last-item benefit and the retro-cue benefit points towards the co-existence of at least two distinct forms of attentional prioritization in working memory.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30551034
pii: S0010-0277(18)30310-X
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
282-302Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.